Imagine you can make yourself invisible (at will) and, thereby, effectively innoculate yourself against the consequences of your violating behaviors.
This playful scenario posits a power bordering on omnipotent. You can do what you want, when you want, to whom you want, secure in the knowledge that you can get away with it.
Your invisibility effectively liberates you from the normal rules and boundaries that regulate interpersonal conduct.
Now let’s be honest”¦with this power, how many of us would use it for our own amusement, and to our own advantage?
The true answer: most of us?
Remember, I said “let’s be honest.”
None of us, of course, so far as I know, possesses this power, thank goodness”¦and let me add that, while I suspect many of us would find some temptingly interesting ways to wield it, I am not suggesting that, endowed with such superpower, most of us would use it in cruel, hurtful ways.
As a matter of fact I think that, for many of us, possessing such a power would carry a burden. I imagine, for instance, a clash ensuing—a clash between opposing forces. That is, between a first force, call it our primitive thirst for self-gratification, and a second force (and the only force with the power to keep the first in check)—our conscience (our heeding of which enables us to sleep reasonably well at night).
So what am I getting at here?
Although I’m not suggesting that sociopaths operate with a belief in their literal invisibility, many of them, I am suggesting, operate with a metaphorically comparable mindset. I call it the immunity mindset.
The immunity mindset, as I’ve implied above, is a mentality characterized especially by the audacious belief and confidence that one can transgress others with, well, immunity.
It must be a heady feeling, indeed, to harbor the conviction that you can pull off sh*t most others would simply find too risky and, more importantly, too shameful to endeavor?
By way of example, imagine that you’re on a crowded subway and are seized with the lascivious impulse to grope an unsuspecting neighbor? The non-sociopath seized with such an impulse may consider it briefly, entertain and even enjoy the fantasy, but then retires it harmlessly.
He retires it for several reasons, chief among them his fear, first of all, of being caught, and just as deterrently, because he knows that the shame that would ensue from his action would supercede, probably greatly, the gratification to be enjoyed from his exploitive act.
Shame, we know, is a powerful deterrent against antisocial behavior. And so it follows that a lack of shame is a wonderful asset to carry into an exploitative endeavor.
Sociopaths, lacking and unencumbered by shame—specifically the anxiety, self-consciousness, negative self-judgement and nervousness that accompany shame—find themselves thus freely poised to engage in exploitative behaviors from which non-sociopaths will typically desist, and to do so, moreover, with the imperturbability of supremely composed individuals.
Their lack of shame, in other words, enables their composure.
In my subway example, the sociopath will grope his neighbor because, first of all, he wants to (and sociopaths, remember, do and take what they want); furthermore, because he lacks, as noted, the anticipatory shame that typically deters most of us from “acting-out” our violating impulses; and finally (and to the heart of this column), because he is as confident as if he were invisible that he will get away with his violation.
Let us imagine, for instance, that his victim whirls around and accuses the sociopath, publicly, of groping her. The non-sociopath would find such a public accusation mortifying. The sociopath, however, just as securely as though he’d been invisible, will calmly deny the charge, or else just as calmly finger the guy standing next to him as the guilty party.
He might say, with remarkable equanimity, “I don’t know what you’re talking about”¦you’ve got the wrong guy”¦.I wasn’t even standing here”¦so it couldn’t have been me. It was that guy.”
Now what kind of world is this in which the sociopath is living?
It is a world in which others are the ultimate objects with which to jerk around, toy, menace, and entertain himself: a world in which he, the sociopath, can imagine doing pretty much anything he wants to anyone, while enjoying, if not relishing, his perceived immunity from accountability.
This is another way of suggesting that many sociopaths aren’t just playing, in fantasy, the game of imagine if you were invisible, how would you exploit your power? Effectively, they are carrying this mentality, what I call the immunity mindset, into the real world.
It is a mindset steeped in a deep, grandiose sense of omnipotence; a mindset, I would add, that leaves the sociopath feeling empowered, and at liberty, to violate others sinisterly with his strange, striking, signature lack of worry, shame and constraint.
(My use of “he” in this, and other posts, is not to suggest that females are not capable of the behaviors described. This article is copyrighted (c) 2009 by Steve Becker, LCSW.)
endthepain,
Can you go to the court before your court date in June for the voilation he has already made? If you keep taking him to court for the violation he has ALREADY made (lack of support) and KEEP doing that, then maybe he will focus on having visitation with your son.
If he violates the court order (support) but you do not go to the court and question that likely he will keep doing it.
Maybe if you put your focus on the SUPPORT end of it and keep taking him back for that violation he might NOT focus on the actual visitation, and that is WHAT YOU want in the end. For him not to be able to see your child. If he KNOWS that you do NOT want him to have contact with the child that might all of a sudden be exactly what he insist on. Time with your child.
If he thinks the “battle” is about money than that might be the battle that he continues to try and “win” with you.
Once he knows that the real issue is that you don’t want him spending time with your child that is when he will try and win that battle. And that is the battle that you DON’T want to fight with him.
I agree with you that you don’t want him spending time with your child. So keep the focus on the “money” part of the agreement. He might get so caught up in that he will not think about the other. Because in the end he just wants to win the “battle”.
I meant to say then maybe he will NOT focus on visitation.
Witsend
ALL HE IS FOCUSED ON HIS THE SUPPORT!! so yes I can keep the focus there DEFINITELY…I dont think I can go to the court before the day of June 17th as he filed this through child support services and they are giving him that date to present his case OR for us to come to an agreement..which I dont think I should.
My concern is since he is soooooo focused about the money aspect he does view any time spent with my son as “credit” meaning less support…so while he is not pushing it right now…He WAS and I let him PROR to findijng out about his lies and his pole to take my son away from me..which he was masterminding with his wife…all communication has ceased on his part since then as he knows I now the truth
* sorry for typos* his PLOT to take my son away and telling his wife I was crazy and an unfit mother
Henry
I keep expecting My P to show up!
I wonder how I would handle it? It’s been over a year now for me too!
It’s funny I play the scenerio of Him comming back and then the Angel takes a Skillet and wacks the Devil off my shoulder!
endthepain,
In the end the best possible win/win situation for you would be what Oxy says.
Relinquishing all parental rights would be the best thing that could happen.
And even though it doesn’t seem fair….He should support his son. He will have his rights (visitation).
And at any point down the road he could start showing interest in the visitation rights to get back at you and hurt you.
If you give up back child support and get him to relinquish all his rights….In the SHORT term he might walk away feeling this is a conquest and he WON. He doesn’t really care what is a stake here (a child), all he cares is about winning a battle.
But you and your son will be the real WINNERS, long term.
endthepain:
“HOW DO I CONCIOUSLY RELINQUISH MY RIGHT TO PROTECT MY SON and allow him and contact with him when I know the affest and harm he has/will cause for my son…”
From where I am standing you are not consciously relinquishing our right to protect your son by putting all the legal safeguards in place. If anything, by getting the legal safeguards in place, you are gaining more ammunition in your fight to protect your son. Until you have everything in place, on paper, and signed off on by the court, he will continue to call the shots.
Short of someone being a pedophile ax-murderer sitting on death row, courts are reluctant to terminate parental rights, no matter how bad the person is. Trust me, I know. You go to any prison in America and you see parenting class, special visitation rooms, etc. Do I think this is wise? Do I think this is fair? Not the issue. What I’m telling you is the reality.
So, dealing with THAT REALITY — the question becomes how do you get this creature out of your son’s life? The answer? The only thing these creatures understand is dollars and cents.
Dollars and cents. Money. Also known as cash, sawbucks, greenbacks, moola, dinero, dead presidents.
You’ve got to use this as leverage. He wants reduced support and continued visitation/interference. Basically, he wants to continue to play (with you and your son) for reduced pay (to you and your son). You want him gone. Only one way to do this. He’s got to understand that to play, he will continue to pay. You must make clear to him that not only will you fight his attempts to reduced his suport, but every time he has an improvement in his financial situtaion either through a new job, new marriage, whatever — YOU ARE GOING TO GO BACK INTO COURT FOR AN INCREASE IN SUPPORT. Punto.
Now that you’ve got his attention — and you will have his attention — because he will see that this is going to cost him a lot of money over the next 15 years — that is when I’d offer him the deal. The deal is the one OxDrover proposed — I will release you from all past, present and future support obligations. In turn, you will relinguish all parental rights and have no further contact with my son. Punto.
As I said, endthepain, it all boils down to dollars and cents with these subhumans. Even when it involves human lives. Sad, isn’t it?
school of thought — get him to relinquish parental rights, get the court to terminate his rights, get the court to issue an order saying that he is to have to further contact with your son, and you will waive his support obligations.
Sorry all:
That “school of thought” sentence should have been deleted.
Victor – I think there will always be a tiny bit of ” did he care at all?” I was used, no doubt about that. I think what I want back from him is my dreams, you know that fantasy of unconditional love that Oxy talks about. At least before he came along I still had that fantasy, my dreams of happy ever after. Now I dont even have that, even if it was a stupid fantasy I want it back…
Matt….
THANK YOU THANK YOU THANK YOU!!! I really needed someone to spell it out for me!! I will go to the court on June 17th and not “agree” to agree and have all the documents needes to show he is a low life cockroach…who has tried to evade paying the support for 3 yrs now..It is funny as I have not taken him to court ONCE..it has all been him and we have gone 5xs in 2 yrs…all at his pathetic requests..So..I will continue that course and then do as you and Wit and Ox suggested….thank you..I understand what is needed to do now….I may need to check back in for some support and questions betwen now and then : )