Imagine you can make yourself invisible (at will) and, thereby, effectively innoculate yourself against the consequences of your violating behaviors.
This playful scenario posits a power bordering on omnipotent. You can do what you want, when you want, to whom you want, secure in the knowledge that you can get away with it.
Your invisibility effectively liberates you from the normal rules and boundaries that regulate interpersonal conduct.
Now let’s be honest”¦with this power, how many of us would use it for our own amusement, and to our own advantage?
The true answer: most of us?
Remember, I said “let’s be honest.”
None of us, of course, so far as I know, possesses this power, thank goodness”¦and let me add that, while I suspect many of us would find some temptingly interesting ways to wield it, I am not suggesting that, endowed with such superpower, most of us would use it in cruel, hurtful ways.
As a matter of fact I think that, for many of us, possessing such a power would carry a burden. I imagine, for instance, a clash ensuing—a clash between opposing forces. That is, between a first force, call it our primitive thirst for self-gratification, and a second force (and the only force with the power to keep the first in check)—our conscience (our heeding of which enables us to sleep reasonably well at night).
So what am I getting at here?
Although I’m not suggesting that sociopaths operate with a belief in their literal invisibility, many of them, I am suggesting, operate with a metaphorically comparable mindset. I call it the immunity mindset.
The immunity mindset, as I’ve implied above, is a mentality characterized especially by the audacious belief and confidence that one can transgress others with, well, immunity.
It must be a heady feeling, indeed, to harbor the conviction that you can pull off sh*t most others would simply find too risky and, more importantly, too shameful to endeavor?
By way of example, imagine that you’re on a crowded subway and are seized with the lascivious impulse to grope an unsuspecting neighbor? The non-sociopath seized with such an impulse may consider it briefly, entertain and even enjoy the fantasy, but then retires it harmlessly.
He retires it for several reasons, chief among them his fear, first of all, of being caught, and just as deterrently, because he knows that the shame that would ensue from his action would supercede, probably greatly, the gratification to be enjoyed from his exploitive act.
Shame, we know, is a powerful deterrent against antisocial behavior. And so it follows that a lack of shame is a wonderful asset to carry into an exploitative endeavor.
Sociopaths, lacking and unencumbered by shame—specifically the anxiety, self-consciousness, negative self-judgement and nervousness that accompany shame—find themselves thus freely poised to engage in exploitative behaviors from which non-sociopaths will typically desist, and to do so, moreover, with the imperturbability of supremely composed individuals.
Their lack of shame, in other words, enables their composure.
In my subway example, the sociopath will grope his neighbor because, first of all, he wants to (and sociopaths, remember, do and take what they want); furthermore, because he lacks, as noted, the anticipatory shame that typically deters most of us from “acting-out” our violating impulses; and finally (and to the heart of this column), because he is as confident as if he were invisible that he will get away with his violation.
Let us imagine, for instance, that his victim whirls around and accuses the sociopath, publicly, of groping her. The non-sociopath would find such a public accusation mortifying. The sociopath, however, just as securely as though he’d been invisible, will calmly deny the charge, or else just as calmly finger the guy standing next to him as the guilty party.
He might say, with remarkable equanimity, “I don’t know what you’re talking about”¦you’ve got the wrong guy”¦.I wasn’t even standing here”¦so it couldn’t have been me. It was that guy.”
Now what kind of world is this in which the sociopath is living?
It is a world in which others are the ultimate objects with which to jerk around, toy, menace, and entertain himself: a world in which he, the sociopath, can imagine doing pretty much anything he wants to anyone, while enjoying, if not relishing, his perceived immunity from accountability.
This is another way of suggesting that many sociopaths aren’t just playing, in fantasy, the game of imagine if you were invisible, how would you exploit your power? Effectively, they are carrying this mentality, what I call the immunity mindset, into the real world.
It is a mindset steeped in a deep, grandiose sense of omnipotence; a mindset, I would add, that leaves the sociopath feeling empowered, and at liberty, to violate others sinisterly with his strange, striking, signature lack of worry, shame and constraint.
(My use of “he” in this, and other posts, is not to suggest that females are not capable of the behaviors described. This article is copyrighted (c) 2009 by Steve Becker, LCSW.)
Good Grief:
“…I am sorry for the things I said and did to get to this point.”
If you are serious about sending this letter, please delete this part from the letter.
You do not need to tell her that you are sorry. At least not now.
I can almost guarantee you will never hear the words “I’m sorry” from her.
Matt,
The words revenge and retribution make me nervous – although they fit perfectly – I am just afraid it will backfire back onto me.
JUSTICE – I want justice. I want my portion of the money he took and spent so freely on himself and his women. I just found out he used to deposit money into the last one’s bank account when she needed it. Boy, would I love to call her and fill her in on the turn of events with the skank next door.
Do you think she would listen? Wish I could get my hands on those deposit slips in his writing!!!
He never gave me and the kids extra – but 10’s of thousands on himself – and he hid it all well – un til as you say – the end.
One year out and the sludge keeps coming to the top.
He has been served his Motion to Show Cause so I am waiting for the payback from that.
Can you imagine his lawyer recommended to mine that he just let a sale go through on the shore house so they could get paid???
Yup, his remark was to let a sale happen – the funds could ebe used for the litigation costs!!!!
How about the funds are supposed to put a roof over my kids’ head and make sure they are taken care of.
Are N’s and S’s known to stiff their lawyers too?
Thanks rosa. I love u:)…
I always value your responses
Delete huh? I must have done something to push her away be plus I said dime mean things in that letter. I read that the silent treatment makes the victim apologize for stuff just to end the silent treatment so partly that’s how I feel and partly I thought it would help the cause but maybe not
I love you too, Good Grief!
If I was 30, I would be trying to meet you!!
Good Grief:
Yes, definitely delete that part from the letter.
If she ever contacts you and calls you out on the mean things in that letter, just say you were pissed off at the time.
What SHE is doing to YOU is far more cruel than anything you wrote in a letter.
Victor,
How about 26 years in AA when I never saw him drunk (and I was with him almost always) in the 25 years we were together? He “FOUND” AA when I was told about Al-Anon because I was reaching out for help because of his behavior. He is now the Guru in AA in his city – has his “sponsees” calling him like flies. His only amends to me were that he “PROBABLY HAD EXPECTATIONS OF ME THAT I COULDN’T LIVE UP TO”. I was told my another AA friend of mine re: my ex – “His eyes came in the door 3 minutes before HE did”. Apt description!! He saunters around the Alano Club with his head held hi, mouthing verbages of shallow expression while his countenance shouts, “I’M HERE EVERYONE. SEE ME-ME-ME!!!
He wouldn’t know a step if he fell on it. He 13th steps anyone who will let him-especially those poor sick newcomers. He offers such promises of recovery if they will only do it HIS way-oh, and by the way-he feels it is his duty to “tell people about the Lord.” The way he drags out the word “Lord” even feels sacriligious. It’s so scarey it sends chills up my spine. With him, there is no connection between the last event with you and the present one. He is incapable of connecting the dots, except to feign feelings he neither understands or will ever be able to participate in on an emotional level. The only GENUINE emotion I’ve seen him honestly express is RAGE-and when I suggested a few times before I axed him that I didn’t understand why he was so angry (he was explaining to me why he had to go to the minister after services and tell him how horrendous it was that the congregation was singing a hymn with the word “wanna”, and what happened to old-fashioned words in hymns like Bulwark) about it, he immediately presented FURIOUS at me that I would even HINT that he may be angry!!! How dare me!!
Rosa what do u think about the 2nd part?
Good Grief:
I don’t think the 2nd part is that bad at all.
But please delete, ” u don’t owe me anything” from the first part.
And did u see what I said when u posted at the same time as me about the apology judgvtrying to end the silent treatment?