Imagine you can make yourself invisible (at will) and, thereby, effectively innoculate yourself against the consequences of your violating behaviors.
This playful scenario posits a power bordering on omnipotent. You can do what you want, when you want, to whom you want, secure in the knowledge that you can get away with it.
Your invisibility effectively liberates you from the normal rules and boundaries that regulate interpersonal conduct.
Now let’s be honest”¦with this power, how many of us would use it for our own amusement, and to our own advantage?
The true answer: most of us?
Remember, I said “let’s be honest.”
None of us, of course, so far as I know, possesses this power, thank goodness”¦and let me add that, while I suspect many of us would find some temptingly interesting ways to wield it, I am not suggesting that, endowed with such superpower, most of us would use it in cruel, hurtful ways.
As a matter of fact I think that, for many of us, possessing such a power would carry a burden. I imagine, for instance, a clash ensuing—a clash between opposing forces. That is, between a first force, call it our primitive thirst for self-gratification, and a second force (and the only force with the power to keep the first in check)—our conscience (our heeding of which enables us to sleep reasonably well at night).
So what am I getting at here?
Although I’m not suggesting that sociopaths operate with a belief in their literal invisibility, many of them, I am suggesting, operate with a metaphorically comparable mindset. I call it the immunity mindset.
The immunity mindset, as I’ve implied above, is a mentality characterized especially by the audacious belief and confidence that one can transgress others with, well, immunity.
It must be a heady feeling, indeed, to harbor the conviction that you can pull off sh*t most others would simply find too risky and, more importantly, too shameful to endeavor?
By way of example, imagine that you’re on a crowded subway and are seized with the lascivious impulse to grope an unsuspecting neighbor? The non-sociopath seized with such an impulse may consider it briefly, entertain and even enjoy the fantasy, but then retires it harmlessly.
He retires it for several reasons, chief among them his fear, first of all, of being caught, and just as deterrently, because he knows that the shame that would ensue from his action would supercede, probably greatly, the gratification to be enjoyed from his exploitive act.
Shame, we know, is a powerful deterrent against antisocial behavior. And so it follows that a lack of shame is a wonderful asset to carry into an exploitative endeavor.
Sociopaths, lacking and unencumbered by shame—specifically the anxiety, self-consciousness, negative self-judgement and nervousness that accompany shame—find themselves thus freely poised to engage in exploitative behaviors from which non-sociopaths will typically desist, and to do so, moreover, with the imperturbability of supremely composed individuals.
Their lack of shame, in other words, enables their composure.
In my subway example, the sociopath will grope his neighbor because, first of all, he wants to (and sociopaths, remember, do and take what they want); furthermore, because he lacks, as noted, the anticipatory shame that typically deters most of us from “acting-out” our violating impulses; and finally (and to the heart of this column), because he is as confident as if he were invisible that he will get away with his violation.
Let us imagine, for instance, that his victim whirls around and accuses the sociopath, publicly, of groping her. The non-sociopath would find such a public accusation mortifying. The sociopath, however, just as securely as though he’d been invisible, will calmly deny the charge, or else just as calmly finger the guy standing next to him as the guilty party.
He might say, with remarkable equanimity, “I don’t know what you’re talking about”¦you’ve got the wrong guy”¦.I wasn’t even standing here”¦so it couldn’t have been me. It was that guy.”
Now what kind of world is this in which the sociopath is living?
It is a world in which others are the ultimate objects with which to jerk around, toy, menace, and entertain himself: a world in which he, the sociopath, can imagine doing pretty much anything he wants to anyone, while enjoying, if not relishing, his perceived immunity from accountability.
This is another way of suggesting that many sociopaths aren’t just playing, in fantasy, the game of imagine if you were invisible, how would you exploit your power? Effectively, they are carrying this mentality, what I call the immunity mindset, into the real world.
It is a mindset steeped in a deep, grandiose sense of omnipotence; a mindset, I would add, that leaves the sociopath feeling empowered, and at liberty, to violate others sinisterly with his strange, striking, signature lack of worry, shame and constraint.
(My use of “he” in this, and other posts, is not to suggest that females are not capable of the behaviors described. This article is copyrighted (c) 2009 by Steve Becker, LCSW.)
Goodgrief,
DENIAL is where a person refuses to accept the truth of some unpleasant thing—that is what you are in. DENIAL and that is NOT a river in Egypt.
The truth hurts, so you make excuses why it might not be the truth. SHE DOES NOT WANT YOU. Period.
You want her. She does not want you= you hurt and are disappointed.
YOU THOUGHT you all had a good relationship. OBVIOUSLY she didn’t think it was so great or she wouldn’t have lied to you and strung you along for a month or more with excuses of why she couldn’t call. YOU KNEW THEN what she was saying didn’t make sense, and yet you still DIDN’T GET IT that she was dumping you….you kept up hope, you were in denial about her not calling because you didn’t want to believe the truth, it hurt too much.
Whether she is a psychopath who used you, or is afraid of your “controlling” or whatever is her reason, SHE DOES NOT WANT YOU.
Right now, your problem is YOU, not her.
Until you get out of denial and accept that (1) SHE DOES NOT WANT YOU (2) NO LETTER IS GOING TO CHANGE ANYTHING AND (3) YOU NEED TO EXAMINE YOUR OWN PART IN THIS PROBLEM, THE CONTROLLING, THE GIVING AND “SACRIFICING” FOR ANOTHER THEN EXPECTING THAT THEY OWE YOU SOMETHING IN RETURN.
Your attitude about what is “right” in the way of “grilling” her is 180 degrees off from the way it should be.
I would sincerely suggest that you have more problems than we on LF can advise you on, I think you should seek PROFESSIONAL COUNSELING for your issues of control, rescuing, etc. and your obscession with this woman.
Other than to recommend that you leave this woman, who has made it clear from her actions that she wants NOTHING TO DO WITH YOU, alone and seek professional counseling for your multitude of problems, I have no more advice for you.
Hello All: I see that GG has gotten a lot of attention, and a lot of good advice, much of which seems to have been ignored. Perhaps if we put our attention elsewhere, GG will start considering what has already been said.
Meanwhile, we can turn our attention to some people who have more serious and immediate issues, who could use comfort and counsel.
All those in favor . . . ?
Rune & Oxy: AMEN TO THAT.
So, Not-so-Shabby: How are you?
Rune: Hi. I’m hanging in there. Had an estate sale at my mother’s home yesterday, 100’s of people! Now I am eating “No Sugar Added” ice cream with fresh strawberries! How are you?
Matt said: It’s not until it ends or afterwards, that the anger boils to the surface, along with the other emotions. I think this “delayed reaction” part of a relationship with a sociopath is what makes the recovery take so long.
I SO feel this. I look back and see how NOT angry I was during the entire time of the devaluing phase. I was so in shock and trying so hard to maintain my equilibrium that anger wasn’t anywhere in sight. Expressing anything but upbeat and supportive emotions during the relationship really didn’t feel ‘safe’.
Totally different experience in the ending of a 13-yr relationship, with a ‘normal’ man. It was just as you said, Matt, we had worked through our feelings– together. Then each of us was able to grieve our decision to let go of the relationship. And, wonderfully, we are still loving toward one another. Supportive friends.
A far cry from NC!
I haven’t heard from the S in 5 weeks, and I still wish things were different, but I guess they are what they are, I certainly don’t call him anymore, I don’t want to open that door. I think I’ll start reading the obituaries everyday and see it I spot him. LOL.
Dear Chic,
Accepting things as what they are is the first BIG STEP toward a healthy and happy and healing YOU! ((((hugs))))
I stayed in “De-River-De-Nile” so long that there is an “Oxy Memorial boat dock” LOL but as much as it hurts, accepting what IS is the only way out of the abyss. Keep on reading, keep on learning and keep on being good to yourself! (((hugs))
good grief:
I’ve thought some more about your situation. There is ONE thing that now jumps out at me.
You continue to discuss, for lack of a better phrase, how to spin your letter to her — not wanting to look desperate, not wanting to look needy, trying to look cool.
Know what occurred to me? If you were in an HONEST relationship you would not have to spin anything. The two of you would have sat down, like adults, and rationally discussed where the two of you were. There wouldn’t have been any abrupt NC like you are experienceing. That s how a REAL relationship operates. I learned that lesson way too late in the case of S.
OxDrover says:
as much as it hurts, accepting what IS is the only way out
That and don’t taking it personaly are the biggest help.
Still left feeling alone though. Not lonely just alone.