Imagine you can make yourself invisible (at will) and, thereby, effectively innoculate yourself against the consequences of your violating behaviors.
This playful scenario posits a power bordering on omnipotent. You can do what you want, when you want, to whom you want, secure in the knowledge that you can get away with it.
Your invisibility effectively liberates you from the normal rules and boundaries that regulate interpersonal conduct.
Now let’s be honest”¦with this power, how many of us would use it for our own amusement, and to our own advantage?
The true answer: most of us?
Remember, I said “let’s be honest.”
None of us, of course, so far as I know, possesses this power, thank goodness”¦and let me add that, while I suspect many of us would find some temptingly interesting ways to wield it, I am not suggesting that, endowed with such superpower, most of us would use it in cruel, hurtful ways.
As a matter of fact I think that, for many of us, possessing such a power would carry a burden. I imagine, for instance, a clash ensuing—a clash between opposing forces. That is, between a first force, call it our primitive thirst for self-gratification, and a second force (and the only force with the power to keep the first in check)—our conscience (our heeding of which enables us to sleep reasonably well at night).
So what am I getting at here?
Although I’m not suggesting that sociopaths operate with a belief in their literal invisibility, many of them, I am suggesting, operate with a metaphorically comparable mindset. I call it the immunity mindset.
The immunity mindset, as I’ve implied above, is a mentality characterized especially by the audacious belief and confidence that one can transgress others with, well, immunity.
It must be a heady feeling, indeed, to harbor the conviction that you can pull off sh*t most others would simply find too risky and, more importantly, too shameful to endeavor?
By way of example, imagine that you’re on a crowded subway and are seized with the lascivious impulse to grope an unsuspecting neighbor? The non-sociopath seized with such an impulse may consider it briefly, entertain and even enjoy the fantasy, but then retires it harmlessly.
He retires it for several reasons, chief among them his fear, first of all, of being caught, and just as deterrently, because he knows that the shame that would ensue from his action would supercede, probably greatly, the gratification to be enjoyed from his exploitive act.
Shame, we know, is a powerful deterrent against antisocial behavior. And so it follows that a lack of shame is a wonderful asset to carry into an exploitative endeavor.
Sociopaths, lacking and unencumbered by shame—specifically the anxiety, self-consciousness, negative self-judgement and nervousness that accompany shame—find themselves thus freely poised to engage in exploitative behaviors from which non-sociopaths will typically desist, and to do so, moreover, with the imperturbability of supremely composed individuals.
Their lack of shame, in other words, enables their composure.
In my subway example, the sociopath will grope his neighbor because, first of all, he wants to (and sociopaths, remember, do and take what they want); furthermore, because he lacks, as noted, the anticipatory shame that typically deters most of us from “acting-out” our violating impulses; and finally (and to the heart of this column), because he is as confident as if he were invisible that he will get away with his violation.
Let us imagine, for instance, that his victim whirls around and accuses the sociopath, publicly, of groping her. The non-sociopath would find such a public accusation mortifying. The sociopath, however, just as securely as though he’d been invisible, will calmly deny the charge, or else just as calmly finger the guy standing next to him as the guilty party.
He might say, with remarkable equanimity, “I don’t know what you’re talking about”¦you’ve got the wrong guy”¦.I wasn’t even standing here”¦so it couldn’t have been me. It was that guy.”
Now what kind of world is this in which the sociopath is living?
It is a world in which others are the ultimate objects with which to jerk around, toy, menace, and entertain himself: a world in which he, the sociopath, can imagine doing pretty much anything he wants to anyone, while enjoying, if not relishing, his perceived immunity from accountability.
This is another way of suggesting that many sociopaths aren’t just playing, in fantasy, the game of imagine if you were invisible, how would you exploit your power? Effectively, they are carrying this mentality, what I call the immunity mindset, into the real world.
It is a mindset steeped in a deep, grandiose sense of omnipotence; a mindset, I would add, that leaves the sociopath feeling empowered, and at liberty, to violate others sinisterly with his strange, striking, signature lack of worry, shame and constraint.
(My use of “he” in this, and other posts, is not to suggest that females are not capable of the behaviors described. This article is copyrighted (c) 2009 by Steve Becker, LCSW.)
Tilly: I’m sure we share a common thought, “Why me?!” I understand.
RUNE:
You are my soul sister!
Of course WE USED to think, “Why me” , but now I’m on LF I would NEVER expect anything different from the Cluster B’s!
ROSA:
( I know you will like this..) A P “friend” I havnt seen for a while just sent me an sms:
” Hi Gorgeous! Long time no see, what you been doing all this time? I was in a serious, really bad car accident and laid up for the last three weeks”.
So I sent back:
“too bad ha ha”
Never heard another thing! Funny about that.
Was just thinking about something. I think it was Matt who said S and P’s have a 10 to 15 year shorter life span. Must get tireing haveing to play make believe all the time. Would think they’d become hermits to avoid a real world.
nic
So sorry but I didn’t see your post yesterday… 🙁
Interesting but I too live in Chicago and remember telling my oldest before he went out to get a light jacket because of our recent cold spell… Anyway…
I remember reading on a site how these people just don’t see other’s need as important and therefore won’t do what most people expect from them.
NPD interferes with people’s functioning in their occupations and in their relationships:
Mild impairment when self-centered or egotistical behavior results in occasional minor problems, but the person is generally doing pretty well.
Moderate impairment when self-centered or egotistical behavior results in: (a) missing days from work, household duties, or school, (b) significant performance problems as a wage-earner, homemaker, or student, (c) frequently avoiding or alienating friends, (d) significant risk of harming self or others (frequent suicidal preoccupation; often neglecting family, or frequently abusing others or committing criminal acts).
Severe impairment when self-centered or egotistical behavior results in: (a) staying in bed all day, (b) totally alienating all friends and family, (c) severe risk of harming self or others (failing to maintain personal hygiene; persistent danger of suicide, abuse, or crime).
http://dslweb.nwnexus.com/jmashmun/npd/dsm-iv.html
I found this site to be very good about explaining the many different traits with someone that suffers from being an NPD. I hope it helps..
Sorry to say but if something isn’t about them then it isn’t on their mind and they can appear clueless and uncaring to others.
I think it was Matt who said S and P’s have a 10 to 15 year shorter life span.
That’s interesting Nmare because I know my bio-mother died before her husband who was a nice guy but my bio M was a B…. Well you know..
Tilly:
You are too much!!!:)
I am ROTFWTIME! (Rolling on the floor with tears in my eyes)
P.S. Why do they all think we are just sitting waiting to hear from them? They need to come up with a pill for that superiority complex they all seem to have.
Speaking of Matt, where is Matt?
I miss him when he is not online.
The Missouri law is not unique. Here in North Carolina I have found that the problem is the judges who sign EX PARTE orders. Basically, anyone can go before a judge and tell their sob story be it true or false and get what they want. The absent party is automatically guilty until proven innocent. My first husband not an Sp but just a wuss and a liar got this attorney to get him an Ex parte custody order by claiming that I was leaving the state and kidnapping the kids. I was in the process of having a house built and never intended on leaving as 10 plus years later I still reside here. He was admitting to me that he was had recently used drugs and had befriended and was taking my kids to a drug dealer/users house on his visitation. Because I refused to let him see the kids without a clean drug test and a treatment program, he concocted his lie. My kids were taken from the church where I worked and homeschooled them by police force without me even being allowed to tell them goodbye. They stayed unschooled and cared for my his Mom who is so bipolar that she has had the life time legal limit of shock treatments. This all came out during the trial as well. Cost me 10 thousand dollars to win. He admitted on the stand to using drugs but it was okay that he did so because he was at his cousin’s grave and the whole family was sitting there using to celebrate the departed’s life. The cop who took my kids apologized afterward and said he went home crying to his wife that night about how wrong what he had to do was. The judge during my case said that it should be a warning to all judges to use more discernment and not to issue these orders without proof. So 10 yrs later, my latest ex who is an SP goes before the same judge who signed the first order against me and gets himself a restraining order so he can manipulate, control, and possibly sexually abuse my step daughter without interference from me and my family. Same judge! Ironic, but come election time I will go after him and his BS discernment with every fiber of my being. His time on the bench needs to be over. A career criminal with no proof claims fear and my nursing license is on the line. The only thing this sociopath fears is prying eyes into his sick twisted life. It is the law that needs to be changed. Unless you stand there bloody and broken or have an ex with a history of violence or proof of a threat there should be no orders issued without a trial.
Joy: So what makes you think the first loser wasn’t an S/P? He certainly sounds like he could rack up a score on the PCL-R!
I’m glad you’re fighting this abomination. Remember to take time to take care of yourself
Hey Joy
You said
“The judge during my case said that it should be a warning to all judges to use more discernment and not to issue these orders without proof. ”
I know its been awhile …but can you get the courtreporting transcripts from back then…Can you get the judges statements and the outcome of the previous ordeal…and ask a lawyer if there is a definite conflict of interest using this judge because of that case and what another judges conclusion was and determination was!!
WOW! I wonder….MAYBE…. you could rally enough to get that judge thrown off your restraining order case..and seek a new judge to review everything with you right there front and center!