Imagine you can make yourself invisible (at will) and, thereby, effectively innoculate yourself against the consequences of your violating behaviors.
This playful scenario posits a power bordering on omnipotent. You can do what you want, when you want, to whom you want, secure in the knowledge that you can get away with it.
Your invisibility effectively liberates you from the normal rules and boundaries that regulate interpersonal conduct.
Now let’s be honest”¦with this power, how many of us would use it for our own amusement, and to our own advantage?
The true answer: most of us?
Remember, I said “let’s be honest.”
None of us, of course, so far as I know, possesses this power, thank goodness”¦and let me add that, while I suspect many of us would find some temptingly interesting ways to wield it, I am not suggesting that, endowed with such superpower, most of us would use it in cruel, hurtful ways.
As a matter of fact I think that, for many of us, possessing such a power would carry a burden. I imagine, for instance, a clash ensuing—a clash between opposing forces. That is, between a first force, call it our primitive thirst for self-gratification, and a second force (and the only force with the power to keep the first in check)—our conscience (our heeding of which enables us to sleep reasonably well at night).
So what am I getting at here?
Although I’m not suggesting that sociopaths operate with a belief in their literal invisibility, many of them, I am suggesting, operate with a metaphorically comparable mindset. I call it the immunity mindset.
The immunity mindset, as I’ve implied above, is a mentality characterized especially by the audacious belief and confidence that one can transgress others with, well, immunity.
It must be a heady feeling, indeed, to harbor the conviction that you can pull off sh*t most others would simply find too risky and, more importantly, too shameful to endeavor?
By way of example, imagine that you’re on a crowded subway and are seized with the lascivious impulse to grope an unsuspecting neighbor? The non-sociopath seized with such an impulse may consider it briefly, entertain and even enjoy the fantasy, but then retires it harmlessly.
He retires it for several reasons, chief among them his fear, first of all, of being caught, and just as deterrently, because he knows that the shame that would ensue from his action would supercede, probably greatly, the gratification to be enjoyed from his exploitive act.
Shame, we know, is a powerful deterrent against antisocial behavior. And so it follows that a lack of shame is a wonderful asset to carry into an exploitative endeavor.
Sociopaths, lacking and unencumbered by shame—specifically the anxiety, self-consciousness, negative self-judgement and nervousness that accompany shame—find themselves thus freely poised to engage in exploitative behaviors from which non-sociopaths will typically desist, and to do so, moreover, with the imperturbability of supremely composed individuals.
Their lack of shame, in other words, enables their composure.
In my subway example, the sociopath will grope his neighbor because, first of all, he wants to (and sociopaths, remember, do and take what they want); furthermore, because he lacks, as noted, the anticipatory shame that typically deters most of us from “acting-out” our violating impulses; and finally (and to the heart of this column), because he is as confident as if he were invisible that he will get away with his violation.
Let us imagine, for instance, that his victim whirls around and accuses the sociopath, publicly, of groping her. The non-sociopath would find such a public accusation mortifying. The sociopath, however, just as securely as though he’d been invisible, will calmly deny the charge, or else just as calmly finger the guy standing next to him as the guilty party.
He might say, with remarkable equanimity, “I don’t know what you’re talking about”¦you’ve got the wrong guy”¦.I wasn’t even standing here”¦so it couldn’t have been me. It was that guy.”
Now what kind of world is this in which the sociopath is living?
It is a world in which others are the ultimate objects with which to jerk around, toy, menace, and entertain himself: a world in which he, the sociopath, can imagine doing pretty much anything he wants to anyone, while enjoying, if not relishing, his perceived immunity from accountability.
This is another way of suggesting that many sociopaths aren’t just playing, in fantasy, the game of imagine if you were invisible, how would you exploit your power? Effectively, they are carrying this mentality, what I call the immunity mindset, into the real world.
It is a mindset steeped in a deep, grandiose sense of omnipotence; a mindset, I would add, that leaves the sociopath feeling empowered, and at liberty, to violate others sinisterly with his strange, striking, signature lack of worry, shame and constraint.
(My use of “he” in this, and other posts, is not to suggest that females are not capable of the behaviors described. This article is copyrighted (c) 2009 by Steve Becker, LCSW.)
Rune..thank you so much as u hit the nail on the head!! I have been completely involved with trying to figure him out and make sense and what could work and trying to stay one step ahead that I am making myself sick and not living and being healthy in anyway shape or form!!! I needed to hear that..it was an aha..in a sense! Thank you thank you! I do have days of clarity and then days of mass confusion but you are right the less interaction the better…and again…no call from him at all to even say hi to his son!
End:
I think we DO know how they think….it’s just so far from a ‘normal’ persons thinking that we have a hard time grasping the WAY they think. We just can’t relate.
I found, after the crazymaking of trying to figure it all out, that if I look at it as opposite of how myself and others close to me fee/think…….then it makes it much clearer.
We mix it up with what we would like for us and our children and the anger of not being able to have the goodness…..it’s not that we want to control or HAVE IT OUR WAY…..we just want our kids enriched with love/affection and the best of the parent. WE CANT HAVE THAT.
Eventually, you come to terms with it…..to some point….I so believe, life is an evolution……and we evolve with our situation at hand.
Please DO NOT allow him or his ways to make YOU sick or put your life on hold!
Don’t sit around waiting for him to come around…..you know he won’t, he hasnt’ so far…..so STOP expecting anything.
We only have ourselves in this world…….
Take your kid out, laugh and be silly together and create the life YOU want with what YOU have to work with…..
Enjoy what you have……TODAY!!!
XXOO
Erin: I recommend caution. There are a variety of ways that a disordered, psychopathic individual might think. I dealt with a stalker who was still sending threats 20 years later. (Highly psychopathic, possessive, jealous and wanted his possessions — such as children and ex-wife.) I dealt with a different, highly psychopathic person who was all about “vengeance.” For what? Well, I wasn’t his girlfriend, and I didn’t want to be. Apparently that was enough for him to go on a vendetta. I dealt with yet a different, highly psychopathic person who was just the “sweetest, most wonderful, most spiritual man,” who gradually stopped being so clever in his playacting, and who started putting off very scary vibes, but never overtly threatened, either physically or emotionally. He was the scariest of all, because of what I found out he was up to, after he “dropped the mask” and I fled.
We talk about “The Psychopath’s Playbook,” yes, we see a lot of similarities in our stories, but also a lot of differences. It is a big, and possibly dangerous, mistake to think that you can “out-think” them.
Consider that there are many ways of having a disability that produces a limp — an injury to the foot, knee, or hip; a deforming or degenerative disease, an injury to the spine, a congenital deformity, etc., etc. The limp may appear to be similar, but the similarities are only superficial. The brain and the neuroanatomy and neurochemistry behind thought processes are incredibly complex. It is a mistake to oversimplify.
Except, simply put, once we recognize that they are disordered, we know enough to know that we CAN’T figure them out or fix them, and in all good conscience, we really can step away from them.
Rune and gang,
Rune, your analogy of the limp is, I think, RIGHT ON….
I might also add a little analogy of my own. I worked with wild animals up close and personal back in the days when I was a wild life photographer (much of “wild life” photography in those days was actually “tame” wild life, though I did spend time in the REAL wild in Africa an dsouth america, but the one thing I learned is that NO WILD ANIMAL IS EVER DOMESTICATED—those guys out in Lof Vegas who did the tiger show and one day one of the cats without warning, picked one of the guys up by his head.
Alll the poppy-cock about how my “pet cougar” or my “pet wolf” or my “pet buffalo” are just such lovers and you just ahve to love them and they love you back, sounds exactly to me how you should regard trying to out think, or out fox a psychopath. THEY ARE NEVER COMPLETELY PREDICTABLE. They are never domesticated.
Maybe that is what psychopaths are “wild humans in captivity” they can “adapt” somewhat, but never truly become “tame.”
We had a jaguar that had been raised by hand since before its eyes were olpen when i lived with my sperm donor, and one day out of the blue he “ate” my sperm donor’s girl friend.
People see “feel good” movies about wild animals and they think it would be so cool to have a pet bear, or pet cougar and it is as stupid as knowingly taking a “pet psychopath” in to your home. It isn’t a mattter of IF IT WILL BITE YOU, it is a definite of WHEN it will bite you.
I have an African Gray parrot that was hand raised and is very very sweet—but every once in a while he gets off on taking a small chunk out of my hand or finger. I enjoy his antics and I am willing to take the risk because the risk is small and infrequent, he isn’t able to kill me or seriously injure me even if he took a notion to, but psychopaths have oposable thumbs and are smarter than my border collie, so they ARE capable of hurting or killing you for “no reason” that you know of. They are “wild humans.” and they won’t t ever be totally reliable.
Ox-Drover: I think your border collie has a conscience and a heart. That puts him ahead, in my book!
Beware of Wild Humans, unpredictable, capable of hurting or killing for no reason, That sums it all up so nicely. Would make a great LF bumper sticker.
Joy: The first word on that bumper sticker is: Psychopaths.
People don’t know what this means, and they need to. You’ve got a good eye.
I just saw the ex P and his new victim ( a girl from India..i.e. so o funny!), in his car, as I drove home. I had a brief panic attack, followed by lots of laughter (release), followed by lots of confusion…trying to work out HOW I FEEL…couldn’t work it out for about half an hour, NO SADNESS OR ANGER, then a BIG RUSH OF RELIEF and a “wish he didn’t have my dog and my things” feeling. And that was it!!
Now its 4 hours later…. no other feelings about it!!!
NOW THATS PROGRESS !!!!!
Speaking of “wild humans”, they actually said the word PSYCHOPATH this morning while I was watching the news.
Apparently, a couple married only 11 days ago, took a honeymoon trip to Australia (hi Tilly!) and the husband shut off his wife’s oxygen tank while scuba diving and let her die underwater while he went to the top to get “help”.
They talked about the “red flags” that people saw leading up to this incident, and also compared this guy to Drew Peterson.
They actually spoke a little about psychopathic behavior and how unpredictable they are. We need more of this dialogue.
I wonder if that woman whose oxygen tank was shut off had any “gut feeling” that something was ‘wronog” about her man and ignored these red flags, saying, maybe “Oh, we just got married 11 days ago, he wouldn’t ……..”
I read the book “Laci” that was written by her mother who apprently in RETROSPECT didn’t herself see much in the way of RED FLAGS before Scot Peterson’s “typical P behavior” AFTER the murder of Laci, but I wonder what RED FLAGS that Laci saw and “pretended weren’t happening” or kept up her “pretense” of the “happily ever after” denial, covering up for Scots abuse of her….I can’t imagine that Scot didn’t abuse her in some ways BEFORE the murder….the Ps and especially the MORE ARROGANT ones like him….can’t keep up the mask 100% of the time with those they live with. I wonder if Laci and Kelsi were both “covering up” this from their families.
I know I “covered up” my son’s abuse and behavior to people outside the family because I WAS ASHAMED of his behavior and didn’t want people to know, so as far as those around me except CLOSE family had no idea I had a monster in the house or later, in prison.