Editor’s note: This article was submitted by Steve Becker, LCSW, CH.T, who has a private psychotherapy, hypnotherapy, and clinical consulting practice in New Jersey, USA. For more information, visit his website, powercommunicating.com.
It is not unusual in my clinical experience to see, sometimes, some quite chilling sociopathic activity from my “borderline personality-disordered” clients. When someone has a “borderline personality,” it’s quite likely, among other things, that he or she will present with a history of emotional instability; a pattern of chaotic interpersonal relationships; and poor coping skills under stress, reflected in self-destructive/ destructive acting-out and a tendency to suicidal behaving.
These unstable trends are not explained by a core psychotic orientation, although individuals with borderline personality can sometimes lapse into psychotic thinking when feeling hurt and rejected enough. Borderline personalities tend to see others in “black and white,” as either all-good or all-bad; they struggle to retain more flexible, ambivalent views of others. Others are either idealized, or devalued; these swings of perceptions can be sudden, volatile, and complete.
Perceptions and/or experiences of abandonment often elicit the borderline’s dysfunctional responses and psychological deterioration. In his or her more stable state, the borderline personality can sometimes function well and seem to be well-adjusted. But more intimate involvement with him or her, over time, will expose an underlying, poorly disturbed sense of self and incapacity for mature relating.
A question I’ve found myself considering is: When the borderline personality is acting, and looking, like a sociopath, is it the case that he or she, in these states, effectively is a sociopath?
It should be noted that behaviors per se are never sociopathic, only the individuals perpetrating them. Sociopathy is a mentality from which antisocial, exploitative behaviors gestate and emanate with a destructive, historical chronicity. But one can infer the presence of the sociopathic mentality from a telling pattern of behaviors.
Clearly there are fundamental differences between borderline personalities and sociopaths, differences which I appreciate. At the same time, when the borderline personality’s rage or desperation is evoked, one sees (and not rarely) responses that can closely correspond to the sociopath’s calculating, destructive mentality.
Once inside this mentality, I’m suggesting that borderline personality-disordered individuals can lapse into a kind of transient sociopathy. Commonly, victims of the “borderline’s” aberrant, vicious behaviors will sometimes react along the lines of, “What is wrong with you? Are you some freaking psychopath?” They will say this from the experience of someone who really has just been exploited as if by a psychopath.
Because this isn’t the borderline personality’s default mentality (it is the sociopath’s), several psychological phenomena must occur, I think, to enable his temporary descent into sociopathy. He or she must regress in some way; dissociate in some fashion; and experience a form of self-fragmentation, for instance in response to a perceived threat—say, of abandonment.
These preconditions, I suggest, seed the borderline personality’s collapse into the primitive, altered states of self that can explain, among other phenomena, his or her chilling (and necessary) suspension of empathy. This gross suspension of empathy supports his or her “evening the score” against the “victimizer” with the sociopath’s remorseless sense of entitlement.
Case example
I worked not long ago with a male, 24, who slit his ex-girlfriend’s tires in the parking lot of the restaurant in which she tended bar. He’d suspected her of cheating with her manager. Notably, they were still together at the time of his act. Although his girlfriend surmised his guilt, he wouldn’t admit it, suggesting foolishly that the perpetrator was probably the manager. While his suspicions of her infidelity had some basis, the important point is that they activated an inner-self crisis and desperation characteristic of borderline personality structures.
Specifically, he feared losing her—a prospect so traumatic that rage was summoned to help mobilize his fragmenting self. His rage was experienced as cold, not volatile. He regressed into paranoia, as one who had been betrayed and, cruelly, left helpless. His failure to soberly examine the circumstances and his inflammatory reactions represented a form of mild dissociation/detachment from reality that enabled the paranoid experience, and processing, of his fear; his detachment (and regression) enabled him to formulate and execute his revenge with his empathy (and guilt) conveniently iced. In other words, he could perpetrate his vengeance with the detached calm of someone who has experienced a trauma, as in a state of depersonalization.
Upon emerging from this state, it would be as if emerging from a sort of dream, or seizure. The rationalization would kick in: what I do in those states really isn’t me, so I don’t really have to take full responsibility for it later on. It’s as if the borderline individual surfaces from his dip into sociopathy once again a borderline (and no longer a sociopath).
Motives that drive patterns of problematic behaviors frequently illuminate and distinguish the personality disorders. In this case, what seems to have driven my client was his crumbling sense of self in the form of an inarticulate terror of being abandoned. For this reason (among others), I can confidently say that he wasn’t a sociopath. But when he was in that regressed, dissociated, fragmented state—for as long as it lasted—I suggest he was.
Ox,
thanks for the support. I can relate to not seeing options that seem so blatantly obvious now. For me, it was another aspect of my denial of the truth. Technically though, I suppose it was ‘repression’ not ‘denial’, because it wasn’t conscious. I didn’t know things, and then decide I was mistaken. I was clueless, on the surface, even though my subconscious knew.
I’m glad you can smile again!
Cedrus
The “Border” in “Borderline” is that which seperater sane from insane. Thus, a Borderline personality is very poorly integrated, having developed few defense mechanisms. Under stress, their defense mechanisms are very easily compromised compared with normal people. Psychotic, often violent and irrational behavior emerges when the Borderline literally DISINTEGRATES, and swings over that border into psychosis. It aso points to their characteristic impulse control problems, vulnerability to addictions, and tendency to self mutilation (cutting). It is why they are so black-and-white in their thinking.
ALL personality disorders are BUILT ON TOP OF a Borderline structure. So yes, you get NPD and Borderline people. A pure Borderline is someone less sophisticated than a Narcissist, or an AntiSocial, because they have not gone on to add a pathological adjustment ON TOP OF their Borderline adjustment. They may well behave in an AntiSocial way at times, but I dont see them as capable of the cunning needed to be calculating abuser. They are inherently too unstabe.
Steve, I would say that it goes the other way around. All PDs will act in a Borderline fashion under extreme stress. A Borderline will simply have a psychotic break, which may or may not get nasty.
It was good to read this again. I just read it as if it’s new and then I see I commented on this a year ago!
So, a BPD can slip into Sociopathy? Is that what this means? I always said “sociopathic tendancies” but now I see in the essay that I am not using the word correctly.
Bad Man had no real remorse or empathy that I could see. Does that mean he is in fact a Sociopath? He sure did display ALL of the Borderline behaviors.
He was bad… just bad.
:o)
alohatraveler
Steve is suggesting that a BPD could slip into Sociopathy. Freud would disagree.
Freud’s view of human nature was rather dark. At our Psychotic Core, we are all greedy, lazy, envious and violent. “Socialisation” teaches us to mask these tendencies via adopting a range of defenses, like denial, projection, idealisation, etc. So, we form a layer over the core of the essentially psychotic onion. In normal people, many layers are formed, thick layers of manners and morals and rationality, so we can pusue our needs without killing everyone else in the process.
If the socialisation is poor, however, we learn dysfunctional ways of coping. These could be anti-social, narcissistic, histionic, dependent, schizoid, etc. Over-reliance on certain defense mechanisms results in poor adjustment, eg the Narcissist over relies on projection, to the point where they are not able to accept, or benefit from criticsm. The layers of their onion are thin and poorly formed.
When you subject any personality to stress for long enough, things start to disintergrate. Thus, a normal person may over rely on inappropriate defenses.
A borderline has only a wafer thin layer around their psychotic core, and will thus cross back over the border into psychosis. A Narcissist will revert to Borderline behaviour under stress. A normal person, not having a narcissistic layer, will also eventually show Borderline behavious befor becoming psychotic – but wouldnt become a narcissist first. A Borderline, theoretically, would be showing progress if they became narcissistic !!! Wierd, hey ?
Alohatraveler: A powerful moment in my therapy was when my therapist casually mentioned that she thought perhaps her x-husband whom she had divorced was a narcissist. I said “You THINK he was a narcissist? Doesn’t it drive you nuts? Don’t you feel compelled, especially with your expertise, to figure that out? ” She said “no, those are just labels that matter to insurance companies” I still pursued “But don’t you want to know why he treated you the way he did?” She said simply said “No”. When I looked amazed, she said maybe we could talk about that some time, and got us back to the issue at hand.
What I figured out is that this commitment to “understanding” is part of what let us get hooked in the first place. Once a boyfriend a LONNNNGGG time ago used to reply to a lot of things I said with “Keep thinking Smith”…(except my last name is not smith). He was a wise man who realized part of my problems I brought on by thinking too much, too deeply, when I should have just said “This is bad for me. That’s all I need to know.”
Justabouthealed
I think it is human nature to want to understand our world. I totally get what you are saying, though, as it is academic. Abuse is abuse, and it feels horrible, regardless of the cause.
Ive spent countless hours trying to nail down what drove my N, but at the end of it all, if he were given a clean bill of mental health, Id still know that he did some really damaging things to me, and that he was bad news. And thathe deserves to rot in hell…
justabout healed said:
‘He was a wise man who realized part of my problems I brought on by thinking too much, too deeply, when I should have just said “This is bad for me. That’s all I need to know.”’
I don’t believe my problem is thinking deeply, it’s my timing: I used to think, then act in a DANGEROUS SITUATION, rather than acting then thinking.
When my gut told me to RUN!, I would sit down and think, HMM, WHY? …
No wonder my psyche is a bloody ragged mess. I’ve spent most of my life sitting on a railroad track, then thinking about why I got hit by a train. I should have moved on, then worried about how not to get leveled ever again.
It looks like a really stupid way to behave. And it is, as an adult. But as I child, I would be (figuratively) hit harder by that train if I tried to save myself. So I learned that the most dangerous thing to do was to protect myself. That’s a whopper of a lesson to teach a kid, and to try to unlearn as an adult.
But I wouldn’t throw the baby out with the bath water and call thinking about a problem a bad thing to do. It’s just not the right thing to do 1st, in an immediately dangerous situation.
Cedrus
justabouthealed..
You wrote “part of my problems I brought on by thinking too much, too deeply, when I should have just said “This is bad for me. That’s all I need to know.”
Yes…. that has always been my part of the problem in the healing after the experience…After three years of reading about personality disorders both here and in books, talking with others, I still have no concrete answer, and I never will.
I know in part through research, that our brains are wired to understand, to make sense of things, so it makes perfect sense to me that part of the whole sociopathic/personality disorder trauma, if in fact, what is wrong with them?
The obsession with our abuser is two fold, reliving the trauma trying to see why we made the choices we did in allowing it to continue, and then making correction in ourselves to ensure we never make those mistakes again, but also just what was it all about?.. In my case, I can see traits and behaviors that fit in many categories. Was she borderline with sociopathic tendencies?.. was she simply sociopathic, was she a compulsive liar, was she a narcissist that also could be a sociopath?….. I see all in her, and then I see not all in a certain fit category totally fits her…….
So… I’ll never really know and at this point, it really doesn’t matter.. the truth is like so many here come to discover.. is that whatever was their issue, their disorder, their disease, they were not good for us, nor would they ever be good for anyone…… and it actually gives me peace to know that nuggut of real truth.. a truth without labels or diagnoses.. a truth I can go on with and let go of the insistence of knowing what God only knows the answer to.
All I can say is, that after 40 years with a BPD mother, I can tell you that ABSOLUTELY there are times when her behvior is sociopathic. The worst part, other than the non-sensical rages, is her patholigical lying. All her friends have left her and most of our family have little to nothing to do with her because of the way she lies about them behind their back. I am practically the only one who will still have dealings with her, and believe me, our relationship (if you want to call it that) is on a very very thin thread. When I am gone, she’ll have no one, making her self-prophecy that she would end up along, come true. She’s always the martyr. Now she is trying to poison my 15 year old son, and pretty soon now, he’ll have nothing to do with her either. If I hadn’t moved out of her house at 18 and struck out on my own, she would have made me just as crazy as she is. They are like a huge black hole and they suck all the life and happiness out of you. My brother and I have come to the conclusion that eventually, we will probably have to have her committed.