Yesterday, Dr. Liane Leedom wrote that “false beliefs about sociopaths are very dangerous.” She quoted a judge who said:
“Well I tell you, the world is full of productive sociopaths. Some of them hold high public office. Some of them are lawyers. It could be that a couple of them are judges, and sociopathy by itself is not necessarily a dangerous condition. It can be productive. I think it was Clarence Darrow who commented on that”¦”
Today I’d like to present a case to prove her point.
Over the last 10 days, the Philadelphia Inquirer has been reporting about Carl Greene, the executive director of the Philadelphia Housing Authority (PHA).
The agency Green heads is the city’s biggest landlord, providing housing to 81,000 low-income residents. The PHA has a budget of $345 million per year, funded by the federal government, and 1,150 employees.
Greene, who was hired in 1998, currently earns $306,000 per year. But 10 days ago, it was revealed that his $615,000 townhouse was in foreclosure, and he owed the IRS $52,000 in back taxes.
And, one of his former employees has filed a sexual harassment lawsuit against him. The woman says Greene promised her a promotion, if she submitted to his sexual advances.
Greene’s tenure
Here’s where the “productive sociopath” comes in.
Before Greene was hired, the PHA had a history of waste, fraud and abuse. Greene turned the agency around, and it’s now considered to be a major success. Public housing high rises—magnets for drugs and crime—have been demolished and replaced by townhouses. Complaints about Section 8 housing have disappeared.
But here’s what else has been going on during Greene’s tenure:
• Since 2004, six women have filed complaints against Greene with the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, alleging sexual harassment, verbal abuse, retaliation, and sex discrimination. (Greene denies them.)
• Greene spent $1 million over the last two years for outside public relations experts, even though the agency has an in-house spokesperson.
• Four times a year, for the last several years, the PHA staff, outside lawyers and consultants were expected to pay up to $150 each for dinners at expensive restaurants in honor of Greene. According to the Inquirer,
There was an annual party to celebrate Greene’s birthday, one to mark his anniversary with the agency, another to laud his accomplishments, and, at Christmas, a breakfast at the Four Seasons Hotel.
Those gatherings were small compared with the bash PHA put together for Greene’s 10th anniversary on April 11, 2008. Hundreds of vendors, attorneys and “friend[s] of PHA” received letters asking them to donate $1,000 to $5,000 to Tenant Support Services Inc., a PHA nonprofit on which Greene has been a board member.
• In 2002, an audit by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development described Greene as a “demanding supervisor” who drove “a number of executive personnel” to quit.
• Employees say he’s created a culture of “fear and intimidation” at the PHA.
Transformation
What’s really strange about this case is how, back in 1998, Ed Rendell, then mayor of Philadelphia and now governor of Pennsylvania, worked so hard to hire Carl Greene. At the time, Greene was head of the Detroit Housing Commission, and one of his employees had accused him of sexual harassment. At first Greene turned down the Philadelphia job, but then accepted it. According to the Inquirer, he signed a three-year contract with an amazing stipulation:
If he were found liable of sexual harassment in Detroit, PHA could fire him – but would still have to pay the balance of his contract, then worth $160,000 a year.
“One simple reason,” Rendell said last week, when asked about that clause. “When I took over as chair of the Philadelphia Housing Authority, it was perhaps the worst public-housing authority in the nation. . . . I don’t think it’s an understatement to say now that PHA is the best in the nation.”
The transformation is due to Greene, whose work “has been stunning,” Rendell said. “He has done more to improve the lives of poor Philadelphians than anyone I know.”
Bloody daggers
Money problems, sexual harassment, self-promotion, and a management style based on bullying—Carl Greene sounds like a classic sociopath. Here’s what an Inquirer columnist wrote about him:
The rap on Greene was, and is, that he’s an effective egomaniac. A vicious visionary, a determined developer, a brutal boss ”¦ Politicians and advocates learned to accommodate the two Carls because he controlled zillions in federal money and the fate of the city’s most vulnerable residents.
In other words, according to his supporters, Carl Greene was getting the job done. If a few folks got steamrolled in the process, well, that was just collateral damage that they really didn’t want to know about.
When all these troubles came to light, what did Greene do? First, he disappeared—for several days, no one knew where he was. When he did talk to the media, he apologized for his personal failings.
He also said, “People with bloody daggers are doing whatever they can to finish me off.”
UPDATE:
Cost to settle sex-harassment cases against Philadelphia Housing chief near $900,000 on Philly.com.
In 2003, PHA planned to solicit big contractors on Philly.com.
Former Housing and Urban Development director ‘not surprised’ by Carl Greene’s troubles on Philly.com.
the attitude at the heart of this evil is in this sentence:
“Carl Greene was getting the job done. If a few folks got steamrolled in the process, well, that was just collateral damage that they really didn’t want to know about….”
might as well say evil people are very effective at getting things done because they do not get pulled by the heart….you know it”s true and that’s why so many of them are elected to leadership positions…eggs omellettes, lemons lemonade…alot of cracking and squeezing to make something “Better” sociopaths do not care who they crush to get where they are going….so what’s the difference between great leadership and evil?
The trains ran on time in Hitler’s Germany.
The ends justify the means?
Enough said.
of course Oxy….that’s the whole thing…yes the end justifies the means….come up with something that would confront it?? enough said?? no there isn’t enough said…keep saying…what are you saying??
I read an article in a newspaper today online (forget which one) about some guys doing a DNA search on Hitler’s family members and they had determined that Hitler was probably part Jewish (other checking had said that it was 1/4th) and that he also had North African genetic traits in his genetic make up. Isn’t that a hoot! The very people he hated as “sub human” were his ancestors. Talk about “projection.” It was also determined that his “war hero” status from WWI was about like Donna’s X-husband’s—manufactured!
I dont’ say that NO psychopath has never “accomplished” anything. My own P-sperm donor eventually invented some equipment that made him wealthy and people who have used that equipment tell me it is excellent. Yet, I know for a fact that my P sperm donor “ate” employees, abused wives and children, killed at least two people, abused countless animals, etc. so was he as “successful” psychopath? As they go, he was I guess, but he was a MISERABLE FAILURE AS A HUMAN BEING. He was a miserable failure as a parent, husband, son, friend, cousin, business partner, employer, etc.
Hitler did make the trains run on time, but at what cost to others?
I personally know some surgeons that I think are very highly psychopathic, but they are excellent people with a knife and if I had to have some one cut on me, I’;d be the first to line up at their door. But at the same time, each of these people has had tumultiious relationships with their families, co workers, etc. They are miserable examples of human beings. Are they successes?
What’s a “successful” person, much less a psychopath? Who decides who is “successful” and who is “NOT-successful?”
“Even a blind pig gets an acorn every now and then.”
“People with bloody daggers are doing whatever they can to finish me off.”
This is classic narc/spath behavior, they can’t take personal responsibility for ANY of their actions. Even when evidence is compiled against them they will blame everyone else, including an alien lifeform, instead of making amends and admitting their wrongdoing. Just like good ole’ Blaggo who got off on almost all charges against him because he used that lovely spath charm on the jury and someone believed him.
It’s like they follow the same spath rulebook, “How to Spath People in Ten Easy Steps”!
1. Take no personal responsibility, even when faced with concrete evidence against you. Deny, deny, deny.
2. Steal when no one’s looking, or when you feel like it.
3. Pretend to be an upstanding citizen, people will always fall for it.
4. Run for office.
5. Make sexual advances to anyone who works for you, is married to you, neighbors, teens, male or female, basically anyone. (Just say you were joking if they want to file a sexual harassment suit against you.)
6. At NO time tell the truth about your past.
7. Use your intense stare to make your opponents (or friends) uncomfortable.
8. The truth can be used in tandom with lies, it makes the lie more credible.
9. Use your charm to get out of a sticky spot.
10. Always believe you are right. You are always right.
Just a few spathy rules to live by.
Nice one hopeforjoy! Ya gotta add ‘cry’ somewhere.
One steppers,
11. Cry when the circumstances warrant it and you need to seem like you’re human.
yaaaayyyy!!!
One Steppers,
Glad you liked some of the rules that the spaths refer to, I’m sure they wouldn’t be pleased if they knew we were sharing the secrets of their success.
Is the new therapy going well? You had some breakthroughs that seemed encouraging. The spaths take so much energy from us that recovery is endless. Although, I still think that we are the lucky ones because our tears are real and we can love for real. Take that spaths!
Really though, hope your doing well and the therapy has improved your ptsd. Better days ahead!!!
HopeforJoy,
Love # 8 of the Spath list–use truth in tandem with lies to sound more credible. I think this is why there is so much cognitive dissonance–and it makes us crazy. Dr. Steve wrote a great article on here about the lies the Spath tells, and that when he tells the truth it’s a lie–because both truth and lies are used to manipulate. I think that’s what i’m going through right now. Spath’s wanna make you think–and this is exactly what mine would do—tell just enough truth so that you’ll think, wel, if he’s telling the truth abouth that, then just MAYBE he’s telling the truth about ______ (fill in the blank)
Hopeful6596~