Yesterday, Dr. Liane Leedom wrote that “false beliefs about sociopaths are very dangerous.” She quoted a judge who said:
“Well I tell you, the world is full of productive sociopaths. Some of them hold high public office. Some of them are lawyers. It could be that a couple of them are judges, and sociopathy by itself is not necessarily a dangerous condition. It can be productive. I think it was Clarence Darrow who commented on that”¦”
Today I’d like to present a case to prove her point.
Over the last 10 days, the Philadelphia Inquirer has been reporting about Carl Greene, the executive director of the Philadelphia Housing Authority (PHA).
The agency Green heads is the city’s biggest landlord, providing housing to 81,000 low-income residents. The PHA has a budget of $345 million per year, funded by the federal government, and 1,150 employees.
Greene, who was hired in 1998, currently earns $306,000 per year. But 10 days ago, it was revealed that his $615,000 townhouse was in foreclosure, and he owed the IRS $52,000 in back taxes.
And, one of his former employees has filed a sexual harassment lawsuit against him. The woman says Greene promised her a promotion, if she submitted to his sexual advances.
Greene’s tenure
Here’s where the “productive sociopath” comes in.
Before Greene was hired, the PHA had a history of waste, fraud and abuse. Greene turned the agency around, and it’s now considered to be a major success. Public housing high rises—magnets for drugs and crime—have been demolished and replaced by townhouses. Complaints about Section 8 housing have disappeared.
But here’s what else has been going on during Greene’s tenure:
• Since 2004, six women have filed complaints against Greene with the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, alleging sexual harassment, verbal abuse, retaliation, and sex discrimination. (Greene denies them.)
• Greene spent $1 million over the last two years for outside public relations experts, even though the agency has an in-house spokesperson.
• Four times a year, for the last several years, the PHA staff, outside lawyers and consultants were expected to pay up to $150 each for dinners at expensive restaurants in honor of Greene. According to the Inquirer,
There was an annual party to celebrate Greene’s birthday, one to mark his anniversary with the agency, another to laud his accomplishments, and, at Christmas, a breakfast at the Four Seasons Hotel.
Those gatherings were small compared with the bash PHA put together for Greene’s 10th anniversary on April 11, 2008. Hundreds of vendors, attorneys and “friend[s] of PHA” received letters asking them to donate $1,000 to $5,000 to Tenant Support Services Inc., a PHA nonprofit on which Greene has been a board member.
• In 2002, an audit by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development described Greene as a “demanding supervisor” who drove “a number of executive personnel” to quit.
• Employees say he’s created a culture of “fear and intimidation” at the PHA.
Transformation
What’s really strange about this case is how, back in 1998, Ed Rendell, then mayor of Philadelphia and now governor of Pennsylvania, worked so hard to hire Carl Greene. At the time, Greene was head of the Detroit Housing Commission, and one of his employees had accused him of sexual harassment. At first Greene turned down the Philadelphia job, but then accepted it. According to the Inquirer, he signed a three-year contract with an amazing stipulation:
If he were found liable of sexual harassment in Detroit, PHA could fire him – but would still have to pay the balance of his contract, then worth $160,000 a year.
“One simple reason,” Rendell said last week, when asked about that clause. “When I took over as chair of the Philadelphia Housing Authority, it was perhaps the worst public-housing authority in the nation. . . . I don’t think it’s an understatement to say now that PHA is the best in the nation.”
The transformation is due to Greene, whose work “has been stunning,” Rendell said. “He has done more to improve the lives of poor Philadelphians than anyone I know.”
Bloody daggers
Money problems, sexual harassment, self-promotion, and a management style based on bullying—Carl Greene sounds like a classic sociopath. Here’s what an Inquirer columnist wrote about him:
The rap on Greene was, and is, that he’s an effective egomaniac. A vicious visionary, a determined developer, a brutal boss ”¦ Politicians and advocates learned to accommodate the two Carls because he controlled zillions in federal money and the fate of the city’s most vulnerable residents.
In other words, according to his supporters, Carl Greene was getting the job done. If a few folks got steamrolled in the process, well, that was just collateral damage that they really didn’t want to know about.
When all these troubles came to light, what did Greene do? First, he disappeared—for several days, no one knew where he was. When he did talk to the media, he apologized for his personal failings.
He also said, “People with bloody daggers are doing whatever they can to finish me off.”
UPDATE:
Cost to settle sex-harassment cases against Philadelphia Housing chief near $900,000 on Philly.com.
In 2003, PHA planned to solicit big contractors on Philly.com.
Former Housing and Urban Development director ‘not surprised’ by Carl Greene’s troubles on Philly.com.
BP!!!! You GO GF!
Manipulation is a ploy used by the powerless. The pity ploy is a manipulation used by a powerless person who sees you as someone who has the power to give him/her what he wants. It uses your empathy and compassion against you.
Neitche said, “Beware the weapons of the weak.”
If we begin to see ourselves as the strong ones, and them as pitiful weaklings who would try to exploit us by undermining our strengths we can get beyone them and their control.
Kim, great point! We must take back our power for them to influence and to hurt us. Once you take back that power from them, there is no way they are able to hurt us emotionally. Only people you give power to can use it against you. If you do not love them, then they are powerless against you. It is getting past the point where we no longer love them that is the biggest pain!
kim and oxy,
…past the point where we value their tiny humanity and value and support our deep capacity for love, compassion and integrity – and share those things only with those whose capacity will support the good in the world
you ever see a Canadian show called ‘kids in the hall’? there was a ‘crush your head’ joke wherein the comedian would visually frame a person’s head (probably have to be at least 10 feet away to do this) between his forefinger and thumb and then crush it. Cursh ’em, laugh it off, make them so tiny they turn to dust….don’t care…not only not care FOR them, but ABOUT them. some day, oh lawd, some day….
One, Nah, never saw it! Doesn’t sound like I would have missed much though. A kids’ show you say? Well, even most cartoon and other “kids'” shows are pretty violent! That’s part of the reason why I got rid of the TV when my kids were little.
Oxy – it wasn’t a kids show, it was very cutting edge comedy, but for adults (a bit of it was puerile). the head squishing thing came to mind when i thought of images of how to ‘diminish’ big things, until they were nothing at all.
Re article, I’ve been pondering this a lot. Some genetic disorders have a bright side, a reason for their evolution like sickle cell anemia trait that is protective against malaria. Was there a time when sociopathy served a purpose, in the days of warring tribes and feudalism, did lack of conscious enable one to better survive? Could this be a normal variant, a recessive trait? It is a completely different set of wiring than the rest of us, and can never be fixed. But then neither can schizophrenia, and there’s not much purpose for that either except perhaps the incredible art that a few of them produce.
Used and abused,
I think there was some evolutionary benefit to being a psychopath, to being the meanest, sneakiest SOB on the block! Cooperation among humans conveyed some benefit but being cunning, crafty and self centered, stealing the last of the food, screwing around sexually and implanting your seed in more women, etc. had to have had some benefit or it wouldn’t have survived. It wouldn’t have become so common.
Other things like schizophrenia which generally don’t show up until young adulthood and BTW in some cultures those people are seen as witches, seers, witch doctors, healers, etc. as they see visions….may still allow the genes to reproduce as in earlier days people didn’t live long and by 20 or so many people had already reproduced and passed on their genetic material.
Good question though.
I can’t cite the source, but when googling psychopaths, I stumbled upon something somewhere that said in battle, during war, a psychopath was the first to attack in combat, that their fearlessness and impulsiveness, and arrogancemade them great warriors, but the empaths who were more fearful and wouldn’t charge in order to destroy the enemy, were the first ones to risk their lives to save a buddy or go out on the feild to pick up the wounded and get them out of harms way. Just interesting stuff to me.
Oh, and let me add, (as if I need to,) the psychopaths never did.