This week’s post is based on recent experiences and inspired by this comment posted on a previous article — “the eyes see only what the mind knows” (thank you ”˜woundlicker’). It’s the on-going subject about how on earth we can open other peoples’ eyes about the psychopaths who live and breathe among us. My recent experiences have highlighted, yet again, how tricky it is for people to get their head around this kind of information — let alone accept that they have been duped!
I often think back to the early days after I discovered the truth about my ex, and how puzzling I found it when people just didn’t seem to believe me when I told them what had happened. No matter how many reams of black and white evidence I had to support my claims, no matter how many times I repeated the story, and no matter how many ways I explained how a psychopath works (based on what I learned after the event) they would still ask questions that left me open-mouthed and speechless. “But surely he must be feeling absolutely terrible, and he must be missing you so much now — do you think there might be a chance you will get back together?”
I remember every time a question or statement like that was made — in all innocence, of course, because they were only trying to understand the unthinkable truth — I felt the emotional blows to my chest and my stomach as if they were real. Over and over, the shame and guilt would be relived as people screwed up their faces trying to make sense of what I knew to be the truth “but surely, Mel, a bright and intelligent person like you, surely you must have known something was going on?” “How can anyone tell so many lies for so long — it must have been exhausting!” Many times I felt like screaming out loud”¦ although on most occasions I decided that calm responses would serve me better in the long run! Yes, I am bright and intelligent (although there were times I began to wonder whether perhaps I might have been better understood had I been deemed slow and dim-witted!) and yes, lying is exhausting for the likes of normal people. But as everyone here knows, we’re not dealing with a ‘normal person’ — these people simply don’t tick the way we do!
We’re NOT All The Same!
As is often discussed here on this site, we don’t know what we don’t know”¦ and the fact is, in order to learn new things, people need to find something — anything — to connect with something they already know. It’s like finding a foundation stone, or a solid piece of ground from which to start”¦. The difficulty with explaining the psychopath, though, is that while they may look like us and often come across better than many normal people, that is where the likeness ends. So people who are doing their best to understand, automatically link the appearance of a normal person with what they know to be the behaviours of a normal person — specifically themselves, or people they know. And unless someone has already been targeted by a psychopath, the idea that such ”˜creatures’ exist and influence others in such a negative way is often pooh-poohed as being far fetched. As if such a notion is as ridiculous as early childhood fears about bogeymen and monsters under the bed.
I remember many times feeling certain that well-meaning people were quietly calling my own sanity in to question “well, you’ve been through an awful lot — perhaps you’re over-reacting a bit? It’s understandable, of course”¦ I’d do the same”¦ but perhaps, you know, it’s not as bad as you think”¦?” I knew at the time that they meant no harm. That their kind eyes and hugs were meant to reassure me”¦ but each time I heard words like that, it would be another kick in the teeth and I’d shut up and hide myself away even further — becoming more and more determined, absolutely resolutely and passionately determined, that some day I’d tell every detail of my story so that I would be heard and believed. Certain that in doing so, not only would I vindicate myself, but that my actions would also provide others with a platform to identify with and make sense of their own experiences. I’m coming to realize, though, that this is just the start.
The Parasitic Predator
In my professional career, I work in the field of leadership development. This means that I am regularly exposed to top-level directors and managers within large organizations. According to Robert Hare and Paul Babiak’s recent study of more than 200 executives, nearly 4% scored at or above the traditional cut-off for psychopathy. Dr Babiak uses the phrase ”˜parasitic predator’ to describe corporate psychopaths, saying “They are parasitic in that they are looking for a host to support them. A big company is an easy place in which to hide” Couple that with the fact that many leadership skills can arguably be translated in to psychopathic traits, it makes even more sense that this level of professionals could indeed include around four times the number of psychopaths than research suggests we should expect to find in every day life. In the corporate world where profit is king and ruthless decision-making can be viewed as a positive if not necessary attribute for successful leaders, it makes perfect sense to me that psychopaths should be attracted to this arena.
It also makes perfect sense to me that, with an increasing awareness about psychopathy thanks to the work of people like Dr Robert Hare, and the growing audiences on sites like Lovefraud and I Am Fishead, people are finally starting to wake up and smell the coffee. Not as much as I’m sure most of us here would like — but it’s a start. Take for example the scathing resignation letter by Greg Smith, the executive who worked for nearly 12 years at Goldman Sachs. Whatever the gentleman’s reasons for writing the letter, he clearly stated the existence of unethical, immoral and callous tactics that he alleges were used by employees of the firm. Regardless of where the ”˜blame’ lies, I for one am pleased that truths like these are being aired — allowing people more opportunities to vote with their feet, and also to become curious as to what is meant by a bad or ”˜toxic’ culture. Along the old adage that no publicity is bad publicity, I buy into the idea that the more these issues are talked about, the more people can choose to find out more — and that, surely, can only be a good thing.
Because it’s a tough job getting people in senior positions to understand and accept exactly how damaging continuing actions of some of their peers can be — to the staff, to the culture and ultimately to the business. I came across a specific case last year, where it was perfectly clear to me that one particular senior person was creating havoc within her department. She was one of those people who knew all the right things to say and could turn on the charm at any given moment. Her bosses adored her, believing her to be the best thing since sliced bread, and her peers admired her business knowledge (marveling at her experience and buying her rather off-the-wall strategy for the business). Her team, though, was terrified of her. When I asked them on a confidential one-to-one basis how they would describe the culture, their eyes would dart around the room, they’d shift in their seats and they’d ask me how confidential their answers were going to be kept. After a great deal of reassurances, I got the truth — both barrels. As these people talked, words such as “fear-based” “abusive” “bullying” and “controlling” came out time and time again.
That, in my opinion, was bad enough. But when the performance of this particular department was actually scrutinized for factual proof of performance, it turned out that the results had plummeted since this lady had taken over — despite her consistent and eloquent affirmations that her plan was working! I found it baffling to understand how she was able to maintain her position — and what was stopping her peers and her immediate bosses from seeing through her performance. Until, that is, I started talking with them and really hearing what they were saying.
I Thought It Was Me!
Yes, they’d heard the rumours and had of course realised that the figures were not stacking up to the original plan. They also knew that it was difficult to stand up to this person in meetings, as she would shout people down and baffle them with long-winded justifications about what she was doing and why they need to stick with the plan. The entire team, not just those who worked under this person, had learned to walk on eggshells around her. This had been going on for so long that many of them had simply given up any idea of questioning her tactics — because it had become just too draining and too much hard work. “And anyway” whispered one of her peers when the truth started to emerge “I thought it was just me! I thought I was the one being stupid! I thought that I just wasn’t bright enough to understand the plan!”
It was a Homer Simpson “Doh!” moment for me. Well of course people are going to find it hard to stand up to people who are highly likely psychopathic — in exactly the same way it was difficult for me to break free, or even realize what was happening. Even after the truth became clear, there has still been (and continues to be) a long journey back to health and self-respect. So I can fully appreciate that it may seem the ”˜easier’ route to just let things continue, particularly in the workplace where (in many cases) you can leave it all behind when you leave at the end of the day”¦ better the devil you know eh?
Well no actually. The devil you know is certainly not the best option in my opinion. Because if we don’t stand up and do something when something is clearly wrong, well then we’re giving the message that this kind of behaviour and culture is ok. It’s in these kind of places that the good people tend to walk away when they realize what’s happening. These are the kind of places where the workforce that is left is emotionally shut down and just there to get through the day rather than being there to develop enthusiasm and passion for the business.
But you know what I’m realising? I’m realising that when people begin to understand and consciously embrace positive team and leadership behaviours, the ”˜devil you know’ is suddenly left out on their own — because they can no longer thrive or manipulate when their peers and bosses are learning about honest and open communication. When the team trust each other enough to say “no” whenever inappropriate behaviour creeps back in. When they are confident enough to ask each other to explain the detail when something is not clear. With those behaviours becoming second nature, the psychopath’s manipulation and mind-games are suddenly ineffective — because fear is replaced with trust, silence with questions, and uncertainty with passion.
And I’m learning that there is no need to point the finger or even use the word psychopath — which, in a corporate environment can create some pretty big responses. No. The fact is, the more we as ”˜normal’ people learn to step up and say “yes” to the good stuff (the things we like, that are healthy, that enable us to grow as individuals and as a collective) and say “no” to the bad stuff (fear, control, manipulation and deliberately confusing word-smithing) the less psychopaths will be able to thrive among us.
And you know what? It only works 🙂
I think you will enjoy it anam cara, it gives a pretty easy to understand way to look at how people behave.
I reread mine every now and then.
freakingravy,
When I was 14, a boy who everyone told me was bad news took a liking to me, something no boy had ever done before. One day he called me, breathless, and said he needed to meet with me about something very important. He rode his bike to my house, we met outside on the street corner. He told me a friend had left a baggie with some green stuff inside, and he didn’t know what it was, and he didn’t know what to do. I can still see his little puppy dog eyes and his veiled smirk. Wide-eyed, I said, “Oh, my God, tell your parents and call the cops!” When he balked at that, I said, “Flush it down the toilet!”
Decades later, when that “boy” reappeared in my life, and I recounted that story, he claimed to have no memory of it. He then proceeded to systematically tear down every boundary I had, smashed my moral compass. Now I now that even then, he had little tests set up for every girl he came across. I wouldn’t play his game back then, but I was vulnerable prey as an adult.
As a smoker, I can guarantee you that I would never, ever view a discarded pack of cigarettes as something that I needed to pick up and put in my pocket. Ugh.
One of the most painful things that came with my epiphany re my ex husband’s true nature was the reluctance of my friends to accept what I was telling them. Finally, when my oldest friend of 46 years standing laughed when I mentioned the word psychopath, I called her out on it. Her response was this:
I just think its so neat and sort of wraps the whole 30 odd year episode up into a nameable bundle whereas I tend towards the view that we (and our experiences) are all somewhere on a spectrum with no definite edges and the danger with naming something is that you then somehow restrict or contain it. I don’t want to sound unsupportive or unbelieving or play down the negative effects of that sort of relationship for you.
She said this in the full knowledge that I am the mother of two adult children with autism – I KNOW what spectra of behaviour are! And why on earth wouldn’t I want to contain the ‘experience’ of a relationship with someone who ‘only married me because he didn’t want anyone else to have me’ (his words)? He blighted 30 years of my life; the whole point of naming what he is will help me ensure that he doesn’t blight the remainder.
So I told her to remember her fairy stories – Rumpelstiltskin, Tom Tit Tot and yes, Voldemort too. Being able to name something is hugely empowering. This wasn’t just some marriage where love grew stale and we grew apart and now everyone’s being terribly civilised about it. She witnessed the effect it had on me. Psychically I was taken apart.
To me containment is synonymous with understanding what it was in my ex that made him behave the way he did. What it is in me and my childhood that brought me to a place where I could so easily be victimised. Why my children are autistic. How I can work to overcome my anxiety about the past and my precarious future. How I can use that information to help other people so that they don’t waste their lives as I did. Because more than anything else, at the end of my days I want to remember positive things, accomplishments.
I want to put my marriage to a psychopath behind me, not be stuck in a morass of despair with no definite edges.
I have difficulties getting people to understand, and I have been researching sociopaths for 6 yrs, and in my 4th yr as a psych major. I do agree that people mean well, especially when it comes to my sp daughter…as I too would love nothing more to “think positively” and “wait til she matures”. I would also love imaging equipment available that reads their brains and provides easy diagnosis. If a teen is going through behavior problems, no one is going to take any issues seriously, because he/she is a teen! My goal in this life is to expose sociopaths, get people to understand, and use this knowledge in a way that benefits and protects us at the same time. Awareness is going to be the key in getting people to understand that we have a problem.
Trla, if only exposing sociopaths would make a difference, eh? No matter how much physical evidence and visible/tangible consequences of their actions, people DO NOT WANT to know. They cannot (and, WILL not) process Truth unless it happens to them, personally.
My belief is that definitions, assessments, and terminology must be revised. Then, the Courts (Criminal, Civil, Family, etc.) must become educated about predatory people. They are not redeemable – they cannot be “rehabilitated.” They are what they are, forever, and ever – amen.
Exposure might be a good idea if it would actually protect other people. But, people are reluctant to accept Truth, and I would love to see Laws amended that would create harsh and severe penalties for spath choices.
The reason people don’t get it is called cognitive dissonance coined by Leon Festinger 1957. It is a mental conflict where beliefs, attitudes or behaviors are contradicted by new information that produces feeling of discomfort. This creates a drive state to eliminate the conflict. We can do one of two things either hold to our beliefs, attitudes and behaviors and say the new information is wrong or we must change our beliefs, attitudes and behaviors to reflect the new information.
In this case the people are having their judgment of the psycho put in question. Very personal for most people. So they will tend to hold to what they believe. Just like the person who is under the spell of the psychopath will defend him to maintain their own delusion. This is why it is so hard to talk to someone that is under the psycho spell. When we talk about the psycho we are also questioning the beliefs, intentions, sanity of the one under the spell.
Cognitive dissonance is also one of the tools the psychopath uses to program their victim. They set them up with the love bomb, the attention and the fake we are so alike. Then the worm changes and the one under the spell must deal with the cognitive dissonance of the conflict between their dream person and the worm. The normal M.O. is to get the one under the spell to change something small then to increase it. Soon the psychopaths victim accepts the psychopaths reality over their own.
My 2 Cents
It turns out in my case that I was personally responsible for not being able to convince anyone of the ex spaths wrong doings. When we were together I spent so much energy defending that puke, lying for him, trying to make him out to be some kind of gift from God, and convincing everyone that he was a great person. I knew he was not. But I had no clue he was a sociopath, either. So when it was over, I don’t believe anyone thought I was serious about what a monster he really was. I lied to make him look good, so how could anyone believe me now? I totally set myself up.
Today was a much better day for me. Sleep does a mind wonders!!! Highly recommended for a clear head.
Fuck him…..this is MY town……and I carried on as such today!
I am still keeping my eyes open, at every car I pass, and down the isles in the grocery store etc…..
BUT….the reality here is…..I am no longer a prop in the play…..I can now sit in the audience…and be in control of my applause and/or boo’s!
I am experiencing the uncertainty of ‘who/how’ are people reacting to him while he’s flaunting his dupe in my town.
Well…..today was my answer…..
He went into my GF’s real estate office…..he stood bragging about himself to the agent at the front desk.
My friend got her broker…..and immediatly told him….that guys’ a drug dealer and he’s had numerous restraining orders on him and he’s dangerous….get hiim out of here! The spath and gaga were immediatly escorted out of the building!!! 🙂 (Gaga is a realtor herself, imagine that might have been a bit uncomfy for her!)
My gf called me immediatly and told me.
Her broker never asked her any further questions…..she’s not a drama queen and her words were taken verbatum, respected and acted upon.
Another aquantance called today to chat. She asked about him……his wherabouts….I told her he was here. SHE immedailty told me that she thought she’d seen him from behind the other day……and got very scared. She said she turned the other way and started thinking about what she’d say to him if it was him…..and she said to me….If I do see him, he would try to hug me….and i’ll say….NO, I want NOTHING to do with you. Sternly.
I believe she would.
It’s nice to know…..in a world of denial, there are those who call a spade a spade…..and don’t let them walk on us without consequences.
He was so negatively affected after the real estate encounter…….he took gaga to lunch. 🙂
DOUCHE!!
EB!!!!! Hey. So your rat fink M er F er is in YOUR TOWN. It sounds to me, as if you have reconnisance in all the right places. Thank God for our girl friends!!!! So glad to hear your cyberf voice. I’m having a disappointing night in a mostly poisitive turn of events. Am working again, but I’m tired. So glad that the town is on your side. 🙂 (you taught me how to do that.) 🙂
EB….so good to “see” you and I’m so happy to read that you’re feeling some sense of control – it’s such a long, long journey to travel before we can take some control back. GOOD TO READ IT!!! I get that you’re concerned about your personal safety, and I’m curious how you manage that. I’ve been quite “fearful” since things ended – well, even before then – and, I’ve been pretty harsh on myself for even allowing such thoughts enter into my head. I don’t think that these notions are really out of the realm of possibility. Anyhow, I’d love to read how you manage that.
Woundlicker – you are NOT 100% responsible for the dynamics of domestic violence or abuse. We stand behind the abuser / sociopath and defend them because it is a normal reaction!!!! PLEASE, stop beating yourself up!!!! It’s not helping you, one iota, to willingly take on the responsibility of what HE DID to YOU. There’s a site that can explain these dynamics: http://www.ndvh.org. I would also gently recommend that you read up on what Stockholm Syndrome is – it is poorly named after an incident, but a long-recognized emotional/psychological mechanism and that is what just about each and every one of us on this site (and, out there without LoveFraud) has experienced.
Woundlicker – you are a precious part of this Universe. You have unique qualities and frailties that make you one-of-a-kind. You are so very valuable. Give yourself a hug, tell yourself that you love you, and have a good long rant to get some of that toxicity out. You are loved and valued for who YOU are, my dear, and this includes your experiences that you’re sharing to heal and to help heal others.
Brightest healing blessings.