Every Sunday my local newspaper, the Press of Atlantic City, prints the names of servicemen and women who died the previous week in Iraq and Afghanistan. Every Sunday, I make myself read the names. It’s the least I can do to honor their sacrifice. Today, Veterans Day, the newspaper printed a story about a local young man, a private, killed in Baghdad six months ago. I’m afraid I couldn’t read the story—it was too upsetting.
Veterans Day was always important to my ex-husband, James Montgomery. He wanted to show his patriotism and commemorate the comrades he lost in Vietnam as a member of the Australian military. In fact, when we met, 25 years after Vietnam, Montgomery claimed he was still affiliated with Special Forces. Military service was an important part of his persona.
This is an important part my upcoming book, Cracked Open, about life with a sociopath. An excerpt follows.
Veterans Day, 1996
In November 1996, James was invited to speak to schoolchildren about the importance of Veterans Day. A few days before the holiday, he went to a sixth-grade classroom in nearby Somers Point, New Jersey. With him were Joe Nickles, who had been an Army drill sergeant, and Bill Ross, who was a local mayor and had served in World War II. The three men sat on kid-sized chairs in the front of the room, talking about life in the military and answering questions from students. A teacher in the back of the classroom operated a video camera, transmitting the presentation to the rest of the school via closed circuit TV.
Each of the men spoke of their experiences in a way the children could understand. They talked about the training and the commitment. They explained what kept them going under fire—concern for their buddies.
A boy asked James a question: “Did you lose any friends in Vietnam?”
James answered slowly. “Yes,” he said, stretching out the word, “and I felt very sad when it happened. That’s why Veterans Day is so important. It’s a time to remember all those served their country, especially those who gave their lives.”
Standing in the back of the room, I was proud of everything James did to protect the rest of us.
When Veterans Day actually arrived on Monday, November 11, 1996, James planned to attend a ceremony in Mays Landing, New Jersey. The previous year, James was the keynote speaker. The Press of Atlantic City reported that he “recounted service-to-the-nation stories about comedienne Martha Raye and retired Major Dick Meadows, who led the raid on Son Tay to rescue POWs.” The local Mays Landing Record Journal ran a photo of him wearing his Special Forces beret and camouflage jacket in the rain.
I was supposed to meet him at the ceremony. But as I was ready to leave, I discovered that James had taken his car keys—and mine as well. After a moment of dismay, I was relieved—work deadlines were looming, and I really didn’t have time to drive out to Mays Landing, stand at a ceremony, and drive back. But my efficient and logical thinking didn’t go over well with my husband.
“Why didn’t you turn up?” he demanded when he arrived home.
“I was going to,” I said. “You took my car keys.”
“You could have come if you wanted to. You could have called a taxi,” he retorted, without acknowledging his own mistake.
I was astounded. “Are you kidding? That would cost a fortune!” I said. “And I’ve got a lot of work. I was better off staying home and getting it done.”
“It appears that what is important to your husband is not important to you,” he said. “Gale understood how important this is. She used to iron my uniforms.”
James stomped downstairs to his office, and I was left to wonder about being compared to my husband’s deceased wife. I felt guilty—temporarily—and then I went back to work.
Never in the military
What I know now, that I did not know in 1996, was that James Montgomery, my ex-husband, was never in the military.
From what I can tell, Montgomery had been including military service in his biographical profiles and resumes since at least 1980. He sent me a copy of the “mention in dispatches” report that recounted his heroism in Vietnam, for which he was awarded the Victoria Cross, Australia’s highest military honor. While we were married, Montgomery was active in the local chapter of the Vietnam Veterans of America. In gratitude for his contributions, the VVA gave Montgomery a plaque, which he hung on the wall.
After I left Montgomery, I began to suspect it was all a lie. I got my proof in 2005, shortly before I launched Lovefraud.com. I sent my copies of Montgomery’s military records—and they were voluminous—to an organization called Australian and New Zealand Military Impostors. The organization’s investigators—all former military men—determined that every document was fabricated.
“We hold copies of documents that indicate he has been constructing his false history over many years and we have never before run across such an obviously labour intensive project,” ANZMI wrote. “Montgomery gets the award for the wannabe who tried the hardest to perpetuate his fraud while also being the most incredibly stupid.”
For more on Montgomery’s fake military service, read the following links. If his actions weren’t so despicable, they’d actually be quite entertaining.
Forged Victoria Cross citation (Scroll down to James Montgomery)
Montgomery’s military claims debunked
Thousands of impostors
Unfortunately, Montgomery is not alone. As documented on the Is he military? page of Lovefraud.com, thousands of men and women exaggerate the accomplishments of their military service, or claim to have served when they never did. VeriSEAL.org has exposed more than 35,000 men who falsely claimed to be Navy SEALS. This is especially shocking because only 11,000 men actually graduated from the SEAL training program. And the POW network, which exposes false or exaggerated military claims, can’t even count how many liars are listed on its website.
Some of these people with trumped up military claims are relatively harmless. They just want to seem important when they aren’t. But many of the impostors are sociopaths. They use the mantle of respectability that goes with military service in order to con people. Or, they con the government, stealing military benefits that they don’t deserve.
Almost a year ago, on December 20, 2006, the U.S. Stolen Valor Act was signed into law. It addresses the unauthorized wearing, manufacture or selling of military decorations and medals. Some cases are being prosecuted. The United States Attorney’s Office in the western district of Washington is prosecuting eight cases in which phony veterans have scammed more than $1.4 million.
It’s a start.
Australia has laws against claming false military service. Montgomery could be subject to a fine of $3,300 and jail time of up to six months. The sentence is ridiculously light, but the law is rarely, if ever, enforced.
So by faking the respectability of military heroism, my ex-husband, James Montgomery, scammed over $1 million from myself and four other women that I know about. I did manage to get him fired from his job by exposing him in the Australian media. But so far, James Montgomery, like most military impostors, has not been prosecuted.
David Pecard – The Imposter. Did you guys see this over the weekend? You probably profiled him somewhere on here. But what I find interesting is that he was actually in the military.
I mean he’s really good. Got himself out of prison and sued the prison.
But he says his cons were not that bad – like the Brito dude.
“But Pecard wasn’t out to make money, he says: “If I’m a conman, I guess that makes me the Robin Hood of conmen, because if I’m running cons, most omy cons have been to do something good.” ”
Right like check female inmates out of prison to sexually abuse them.
Yet is is so damn likeable and attractive right. In his interview he is so sincere – yet there is something waxy about him.
This is the best… “Army discovered that Pecard had enlisted and deserted at least seven times under seven different identities.”
Facing overwhelming evidence, Pecard pleaded guilty. Then he begged for leniency, saying that he had enlisted at 14 to serve his country and had seen combat in Vietnam. But the Army’s lead prosecutor, Gloria McKinney, says that she found no evidence that Pecard had even been there at all. ”
He once tracked down and captured another conman like himself. I guess it takes one to know one.
It’s amazing that this man is out and free… gets on television… people seem to like him and he is gettiing into acting.
Thisi s what I find incredible….”But whenever there was a threat of being discovered, he vanished: “When I reach a point where I can no longer safely be that person, then now I have one focus: I must survive and I must create a new person,” he says. ”
Look, no one can deny that the survival instincts of these people are pure genius… but it’s like evil genius.
It’s like what’s the difference between someone like this and someone with Multiple Personality Disorder (now known as Dissociative Identity Disorder)?
This is how he described it…
“We’re trying to build that model person,” says Pecard, referring to himself plurally. “It’s like raising a new child. What do you want to be when you grow up? Well, this one wants to be a lawyer so he goes to law school.”
Read more about him.. he’s so fascinating…
http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/1999/11/10/48hours/main54256.shtml
What kills me is they all say they are turning over a new leaf — changing – goiing straight.
Don’t really know my point. I guess..even when they are in the military for real, it’s a con or a fraud in some way and they always embellish their stories.
How he changed his identity so many times and got different social security numbers… I mean it’s almost like they can do anything because they believe they can.
Anyway… thought I would share this with you thought you all probably know about him already.
T
This guy.. Wayne Simms is his real name…. Davis Pecard is just one of many names used. This guy is a con. Charming, but yet a lier. He lives in Phoenix…. In a townhouse complex… I used to be a neighbor. Navy veteran myself, he talked to me and lied about being a cop. He said he was a cop for the LA county sheriff and he had been shot in the line of duty. He also gave me a card with the David Pecard name stating he was atty. and could help with legal problems and tried to get my records. Oh hell no!! He still lives in the same place as 5/3/08. I know….I know someone that is still friends with him…….even after I told her what he could do….but he has NOT changed and he gets NO credit for any military time served….. He needs to be in a mental hospital…… HONESTLY!! This guy is a joker!! He will meet his maker oneday. Navy Veteran….
Swoosh,
I totally disagree, he should NOT be in a mental hospital, he should be in PRISON where con men belong, he is NOT crazy, he is MEAN, EVIL, SELFISH, and a CRIMINAL.
i
“Lewis died suddenly at home in May, 1996, at the age of 43. Montgomery, who was home with her, called an ambulance.”
Marying a psychopath is a life expenctancy hazard. Any post-mortem?
Yes. It appears that Montgomery’s actions contributed to her death, although there is no evidence that he directly killed her. I tell the story in my book, Love Fraud, which is coming out in the spring.
Donna,
This is a very interesting thread. I would like to add some info about a person I believe to be a spah. What are the guidelines for doing so?
best,
one step
In response to the comments concerning David Pecard…
Unfortunately when this segment was originally aired (1999) in the course of editing there were large details that were taken from this documentary, it was truly scaled down to fit a call for media ratings. In the documentary, it does not detail that these were events that had taken place in the 1980’s and what took place that called for the investigation to expose Mr. Pecard, including the chain of events established before his arrest that were staged by Maricopa County. David Pecard and his family have and are continually working to keep these events concerning their lives in the past where it belongs. David Pecard has acknowledged his mistakes and his willing participation in them. Although this segment is very interesting, there is a side of the truth that was not aired. We would just like to move beyond this.
civilizedmanner – You seem to to speak either Mr. Picard or his family. It would be appropriate to identify your interest in this manner.
Our interest, here at Lovefraud, is to educate ourselves about ppathy and narcissism in order to heal from the destruction wrought in our lives by disordered people and to protect ourselves from further encounters. Part of this education is to identify and learn from cases of service fraud. Hence, we do discuss the cases in media – past and present.
Unfortunately, it is important that people know of David Picard’s actions in the world. Past behavior often being indicative of future behavior, knowing what he has done and sharing this information is also part of protecting ourselves and others.
I suggest you email Donna Anderson directly if you feel that you could bring more information, ‘a side of the truth’, to the discussion.
EX CUSEEEEEE ME?
David Pecard and his “family”? Which family, the boy he deserted at age 6 days or the other wives he took off and left?
If even 1% of the behavior he is supposed to have done is correct, he has shown himself to be HIGH IN PSYCHOPATHIC TRAITS and LOW on empathy or caring for anyone except HIMSELF.
I BET he would like to “move beyond” this and PRETEND NONE OF THIS EVER HAPPENED—that’s not the way life works, though. There are consequences for bad choices and bad behavior and being a pathological liar for decades means no one believes you or anyone who tries to say what a “good guy” you are. Sorry. The best indicator of future behavior is past behavior.
BTW I think Sheriff Joe is a GOOD GUY!
It’s very easy to watch a television program and to be engulfed in what media playrights decide to air, but in all that we watch on television, no matter how it is rated as non-fiction we still have to understand that there is a side of truth in every situation.
I, like each one of you, look to be healed and seek closure from the effects of the actions, decisions and behavior of others, I am his daughter and I in no way make any excuse for him because I have been greatly affected by his decisions, he, I and all of my siblings understand that his actions and decisions were wrong and again I speak on his behalf and for our family (all that were affected including the wives) we are moving forward.
There has been acknowledgement that his decisions were not good decisions nor were they of the best intentions, and as a family, a supportive family we are putting these chain of events behind us… not to pretend that they have never happend because we live the results of them everyday, but to move past adversity and live a life that manifests our triumph over this mountain. Through this and other trials we all have learned that our past does not indicate our future, with determination, love and support, anyone can move beyond anything.
I understand everyone has the right to their opinion, I definitely own the rights to mine, but I just wanted to share from an intimate point of view. I do not take the side of my father because of who he is, I am the first to tell him if he is wrong and when his actions are displeasing, I do not believe in aiding anyone when their character and integrity have become discredited but I do believe that everyone deserves a second chance and with love, support and guidance (whether clinical, religious, etc) I believe that everyone can overcome.
My father’s actions have wounded many people but wounds do heal, some take longer than others but the end result is they all have the ability to heal.
Best to you all!