7 reasons why regular people enable sociopaths

Jerry Sandusky

Three former administration officials of Penn State University were sentenced to jail last Friday because they failed to report signs that Jerry Sandusky, the former assistant football coach, was sexually abusing boys.

This is right and just. They should be held accountable.

The former university president, Graham B. Spanier, will spend at least two months in jail, followed by two months of house arrest. Gary Schultz, the former athletic director, and Tim Curley, a former vice president, will also spend time in jail, followed by house arrest.

On October 9, 2012, Sandusky was sentenced to 30 to 60 years in prison for assaulting 10 boys. However, more men also came forward, and Penn State offered settlements to approximately 30 victims.

Penn State University has paid out nearly $250 million in settlements, legal bills, fines, public relations and other costs as a result of the scandal. Much of this would have been avoided if the administrators had acted appropriately when they learned about Sandusky’s behavior.

The Philadelphia Inquirer quoted Prosecutor Laura Ditka’s statement about the president, Spanier:

“He was a complete and utter failure as a leader when it mattered the most,” Ditka said during Friday’s hearing. “He made the choice to protect his reputation, the reputation of his friends and the reputation of the university above the well-being of these children. And that is inexcusable.”

Read complete coverage:

Penn State’s Spanier gets jail for role in Sandusky scandal, on Philly.com.

Jerry Sandusky is a sociopath (although as part of his defense he said he suffered from histrionic personality disorder). The three university officials failed to do what was right when they became aware of his sexual abuse, and therefore enabled Sandusky to keep on preying on boys.

Unfortunately, plenty of normally good, upright people fail to take action when we become aware of sociopathic manipulation, exploitation, and crimes. Here are seven reasons why.

  1. We lack awareness about sociopathic behavior.

This is a major blind spot that applies to almost everyone — including all of us, before our personal encounters with sociopaths.

Society teaches us that we’re all created equal, we’re all God’s children, we all just want to be loved, and everyone has good inside. This is true for 84% of the population. But no one tells us about the approximately 16% of the population — those with exploitative personality disorders, for whom none of these platitudes apply.

Therefore, even when we see evidence of any kind of abusive behavior, we doubt ourselves. We can’t imagine that the people are actually doing what we think they are doing. We must be wrong, we must be imagining things, so we do nothing.

  1. We are deceived.

Sociopaths lie. They lie a lot. They lie about incidents large and small. Unfortunately, for a very long time, we don’t know that they are lying.

This is especially true because sociopaths engage in impression management. In the beginning of any kind of involvement, they are friendly, helpful, charming, reliable and thoughtful.

They are creating a trustworthy image. We see the behavior, and because all human beings are designed to trust, we have no reason to second-guess the authenticity of their actions.

So when sociopaths make the switch, and embark on manipulation and exploitation, we are pre-programmed with their trustworthy image, and assume the bad behavior must be some kind of mistake.

  1. We want to protect an organization or institution.

This is clearly what happened in the Penn State case — jurors were shown emails that prosecutors said the three administrators hatched a plan to keep the issue quiet.

This also happens in the cases of military spouse abuse. When wives, and some husbands, are abandoned, military commanders have an obligation to make sure the soldier does what he is supposed to do for his family. But many commanders are more focused on the mission and the reputation of the services. If some individuals are getting trampled in the meantime, well, that’s just too bad.

In any kind of cover-up, doing what’s right loses out to doing what’s good for a certain person, group or organization.

  1. We don’t want to get involved.

We all have our own issues and problems. Making a report may mean that we become involved with a criminal or legal matter, or with someone else’s problems. We tell ourselves that we simply don’t have the time or energy for another situation.

It’s easier to just stay out of it.

  1. We fall for the spin.

Perhaps we actually stage an intervention about the sociopath’s unacceptable behavior. Immediately, the sociopaths start spinning it. They have excuses; they have reasons; they tell you it’s not what it appears to be.

Or, they admit the error of their ways, and promise to change. And they may appear to change — for a little while.

We don’t really want a partner, friend or co-worker to get in trouble — we just want them to stop the abuse. So we fall for the spin and give them another chance. Eventually, however, the bad behavior resumes. In fact, it may be worse than ever.

  1. We are caught in the web.

Sociopaths are expert at pulling people into their plots and conspiracies. Of course, they do not announce their intentions. They draw us in bit by bit. Sociopaths convince us to overlook one thing, and then something else. They push us to violate a boundary, and then another one. Before we know it, we are in over our heads.

This is a standard practice when sociopaths are bleeding us for money. They borrow a little bit, and may actually pay it back, in order to establish trust. Then they keep asking for money — not for themselves, of course, but because there is some crisis that requires cash to fix.

When the bank account is empty, they ask about credit cards. Or a second mortgage. Or borrowing money from friends and family.

Then we realize something illicit is going on. But if we report the matter, we ourselves are complicit.

  1. We fear retribution.

Sooner or later, we learn that sociopaths are highly vindictive. If we take a stand against them, we know that their wrath will be turned on us.

This often happens in divorce and child custody situations. This partner who was once so loving becomes the most vile person in the world. There is no amicable split. There is no doing what’s best for the kids.

Many sociopaths approach divorce with scorched earth tactics. They don’t just want to leave you; they want to crush you. And typically, they’ve been planning their escape long before you even knew there was a problem, so they’ve depleted the money, eroded your support system and perhaps even framed you for crimes.

You may want to do what’s right, but the sociopath doesn’t. So all you can do is figure out how to survive.

How to stop enabling

The key to putting an end to enabling behavior is to understand that a sociopath, once an adult, will not change. It doesn’t matter how much we cajole or appease, the sociopath will continue to exploit and manipulate.

Therefore, enabling behavior like those listed above may work in the short term, but over time, they are likely to backfire — as it did in the Penn State case. Therefore, the sooner enabling stops, the better.



Comment on this article

30 Comments on "7 reasons why regular people enable sociopaths"

Notify of

angelofdarkness This is about Jerry Sandusky.

I still say people lack awareness.

Or don’t want to see. Denial.

yes, denial.

The only New Year’s Resolution I’ve ever been somewhat successful with was when I resolved to stop lying to myself about people. It has become easier the more I practice, and it has helped me to let go of some really difficult people. Now, when I see red flags, instead of denying them, I start writing them down.

Great idea.

Some want to protect an organization or institution.

The mother of the piece of shit who ruined my life and attempted to pass an STI to me is actively involved in search for new victims for her disgusting, disordered son . She and his sister set him up with his second wife and now with a friend of hers . An older woman with 4 daughters. She writes on Facebook that ‘someone’ is trying to smear his character and make him someone he isn’t…Despite the fact that he was jailed for forging his divorce papers and it’s a public knowledge, articles and mugshots available online !
Both of them are deeply devoted to god !
Sick beyond belief!

Lack of awareness and denial.

Some of them think it is normal if it is what they have grown up with.

I turned in the sociopath I was dating to the army when I found out what he was. Fortunately for me, they believed me, because they had also suspected him of fraud – and they were correct in their suspicions. It was still hard to do because I feared retribution. They also told me at one point that he was suicidal and asked if I still wanted to continue giving them my statement. I knew he had a toddler, and I had momentary pity for him and the child. But I remembered that sociopaths use pity as a tool for manipulation, so I continued. In the end he was found guilty of fraud and adultery through the US army where he had served as an Iraqi vet. I’m sure they just gave him a slap on the wrist, but at least he probably got a dishonorable discharge.

I cannot imagine standing by idly if I saw a child being abused. But I can certainly understand the fear of retribution and rocking the boat in a culture of silence and secrecy. I don’t find too many role models in our current administration for honesty and integrity in general. So many either are corrupt or protect the status quo of the corrupt for fear of rocking the boat or losing their jobs. Greed can be a big motivator for staying silent. I guess we have to be our own role models in 2017.

I would love to have been around in the days of Abe Lincoln who was reputed to have great integrity. Before becoming president, he was an attorney. On a few occasions, he heard evidence that convinced him that his client was guilty. He is said to have stood up and walked off the case every time. We could use more role models like him.

A mutual friend of a female spath said ‘she means well but she is intrusive’. Denial.

I wonder if this applies to the Mandalay Bay Hotel allowing Paddock to bring all the guns to his hotel room.

I don’t suppose the hotel staff knew a thing about the guns, Sunnygal. Of course, I’m sure guests do bring long guns into hotel rooms if they’re staying there for a hunting trip for instance. But according to an L.A. Times article, Paddock had SEVENTEEN rifles in his room, plus six other guns!—whether shotguns or handguns isn’t clear. I’d be astounded if the hotel staff took no notice of an arsenal like that! It looks as though Paddock smuggled his guns in luggage.

One thing they have said is that it looks as if Paddock was granted the privilege of using the hotel’s freight elevator to go back and forth to his room. I’m not sure what the advantage of that is for guests in general. Privacy? Being able to avoid the queue for the regular elevators? Anyway because the guy was a “high roller” (and no doubt a frequent guest there) they were willing to give him red carpet treatment, and they wouldn’t risk offending him by asking prying questions about what was in his luggage, even if he had a lot of it.

Mind you, I have NO idea why he needed so MANY guns for this massacre. I don’t believe he even used them all. But if any of them were very long, a GOLF BAG would be ideal for smuggling rifles or shotguns into a hotel. A golf bag would be completely unremarkable when so many businessmen going to a town like Vegas would be playing golf there anyway, just as they do here in Phoenix because of the nice weather even in winter.

In any case Paddock may not have needed a whole array of golf bags, since some of his guns were not all that long. According to an article in the L.A. Times, he had FOUR Daniel Defense DD-M4 rifles, and THREE Fabrique Nationale FN-15 rifles, as well as others by SIG-Sauer. Now what’s interesting about those rifles?

Well, they all shoot the same NATO standard .223 (5.56mm) round, just like the M16/AR-15. So all the ammo and most likely the magazines as well would be interchangeable. John Kelly the profiler commented on the well-known characteristics of that round.

Also, they’re relatively EXPENSIVE guns, at $1700-$1800 apiece, when Paddock could have bought, say, the popular Colt or Bushmaster AR-15 for half or even a third of the price. But he was a millionaire, so expense was no object, especially since he wasn’t going to have any more use for his money where he was going! (A very HOT place, I hope!) Apart from that, I expect his attitude was that “nothing but the best was good enough” for him. Also he was planning to take shots from long range, so he may have appreciated the accuracy that comes with higher quality—at a price.

However, one of the most interesting features of the Daniel Defense and the FN rifles is that they have a COLLAPSIBLE STOCK that telescopes. Now a standard military M16, or its semiauto version, the AR-15, is nearly FORTY inches long. By comparison, the largest suitcases these days are usually sized to meet airline requirements with dimensions totaling 62 inches, which boils down to about 30″ x 20″ x 12″. Well, you can’t fit anything into a suitcase that’s longer than the longest diagonal, which is about 36 inches (thank you, Pythagoras!) So an AR-15 WON’T FIT! But those Daniel Defense or FN-15 rifles are only about 31 inches long with the stock pushed in. So in spite of their other projections they most likely WILL fit in an ordinary suitcase, especially if you take the flash hider off the muzzle, which saves another inch or more. The fact that those rifles are short just could be one reason why Paddock chose them. Then nobody would know his suitcases were concealing such a formidable armory.

He DID, according to John Kelly, have at least one AR-15 rifle in addition, which Kelly described as “modified into a fully automatic weapon.” But I think that statement was misleading. I don’t think Kelly meant a proper “full auto” conversion. I’m sure he’s referring to the rifle fitted with a BUMP STOCK that could emulate full auto fire. Why an AR-15? Possibly because it’s an extremely POPULAR rifle, and bump stocks for it are more readily available. But in this case, even if the AR-15 won’t fit into a suitcase fully assembled, Paddock had to DISMANTLE it anyway to put that bump stock on. So once again I’m sure he smuggled it into his room in a suitcase—in two pieces!

And the hotel staff would never have guessed a thing!

Redwald Look at the article I just posted- ‘the las vegas shooting in just the beginning of the nightmare for the hotel’.

Psychopaths are good at pretending to be normal.


Send this to a friend