By Joyce Alexander, RNP (Retired)
Dr. George K. Simon, Jr., Ph.D. received his degree in clinical psychology from Texas Tech University and has studied and worked with manipulators and their victims for many years. Dr. Simon has taught over 250 workshops on the subject of dealing with manipulative people. In 1996, he published In Sheep’s Clothing—Understanding and Dealing with Manipulative People. This book is in its ninth printing.
The book is divided into two principle parts. Part I is “Understanding Manipulative Personalities” and Part II is “Dealing Effectively with Manipulative People.”
Two Important Types of Aggression
Dr. Simon describes two types of aggression:
Two of the fundamental types of aggression ”¦ are overt and covert aggression. When you’re determined to have your way or gain advantage and you’re open, direct, and obvious in your manner of fighting, your behavior is best labeled overtly aggressive. When you’re out to “win,” get your way, dominate, or control, but are subtle, underhanded, or deceptive enough to hide your true intentions, your behavior is most appropriately labeled covertly aggressive. Concealing overt displays of aggression while simultaneously intimidating others into backing off, backing down, or giving in is a very powerful manipulative maneuver. That’s why covert aggression is most often the vehicle for interpersonal manipulation.
Though Dr. Simon doesn’t call the “manipulative” people he describes psychopaths, he seems to completely understand the manipulation techniques of psychopaths as we know them.
The tactics that manipulators frequently use are powerful deception techniques that make it hard to recognize them as clever ploys. They can make it seem like the person using them is hurting, caring, defending, or almost anything but fighting for advantage over us. Their explanations always make just enough sense to make another doubt his or her gut hunch that they’re being taken advantage of.
Therapists whose training overly indoctrinated them in the theory of neurosis, may “frame” the problems presented to them incorrectly ”¦ In other words, they will view a hardened, abusive fighter as a terrified runner, thus misperceiving the core reality of the situation.
Though Dr. Simon calls what we might term a psychopath an aggressive personality (overtly aggressive or covertly aggressive), he sums up both types of aggressive person as “Their main objective in life is ”˜winning’ and they pursue this objective with considerable passion. They forcefully strive to overcome, crush, or remove any barriers to what they want.”
In Part II of the book, Dealing Effectively with Manipulative People, Dr. Simon gives some interesting and realistic ways to deal with the “wolves in sheep’s clothing.”
There are several things a person must do to ensure that the frequent contests of life are played on a level field. To guard against victimization, you must be free of potentially harmful misconceptions about human nature and behavior; know how to correctly assess the character of others; have a high self-awareness, especially regarding those aspects of your own character that might increase your vulnerability to manipulation, recognize and correctly label the tactics of manipulation and respond to them appropriately; and avoid fighting losing battles.
The suggestions Dr. Simon makes in the remainder of the book are simple, easily understood and are designed to empower us. I highly recommend this book.
In Sheep’s Clothing—Understanding and Dealing with Manipulative People is available on Amazon.com.
Kim quoted “Masters of manipulation.”
So true, and looking back, I can picture my N mentally “beating his chest” with victory, as you describe above. Sick stuff.
I’m reading a book online about “violence and the sacrificial victim”.
It discusses the mythology surrounding sacrificing.
One part talks about a sacrifical victim being a substitute for the real object of violence. The victim is chosen because it is not as valuable as the original object.
I know for a fact that my P despises his mother.
When he was 12 she divorced his father. She never told her 6 sons that their father had been unfaithful to her. But my P became defiant and truant so she put him in juvinile detention. Then he escaped by conning the jailer and ran away for several years. Before he escaped, she saw him one time and he spat out, “I WILL HATE YOU UNTIL THE DAY I DIE”.
When I met my P he took me to see both of his parents at different times. He also told me that I reminded him of his mother. She is a heavyset, german woman who looked like Drew Barrymore as a young girl. I’m dark haired and small boned, practically anorexic-looking at times.
So I asked, “What part of me reminds you of your mother?”
“You both have brown eyes.” was his response with a smile.
Then his father died and he refused to allow me to attend the funeral with him.
My point, is that it has become obvious to me that he has substituted me and all women for the one woman that he cannot kill – his own mom.
He caused a previous girlfriend to commit suicide and I know thats what he wanted from me.
He will continue to search for that sacrificial victim for the rest of his life I guess.
Anyone else know of “mommy issues” with their P?
Skyler, are you reading Violence and the Sacrid? OMG. Can’t wait to discuss it with you. I read it for a graduate English course titled, Classical Lit and Contemporary Critism. It was many years ago, but I found the book to be really profound.
Also Skylar, if your interested in men’s “mommy issues” you’d like, Oedipus, Phylosopher, by Goux.
yeah Kim, that’s the book. Parts of it are online. I’ll have to search for it at my library to read the rest.
I would love to discuss it with you because this whole experience has been surreal. I guess anything that delves into the primordial areas of the human mind (and narcissism definitely does) is going to feel very strange. This experience has been so much like having a death in the family, except worse because… well it’s more like a murder in the family but the murder victim was me! You know what I mean?
This is the closest you can come to being killed without dying, I think. Really bizarre.
Mythology is the only thing that comes close to grasping the incomprehensible.
I just finished reading the online preview of:
The king and the corpse: tales of the soul’s conquest of evil By Heinrich Robert Zimmer, Joseph Campbell
basically it says this shit happened to me because I’m not EVIL ENOUGH. Yep.
My lack of evil is like a vaccuum that attracts evil.
I’m lopsided.
I need to find an evil deed and integrate it into my superego.
You all know deep in your hearts that it’s true.
Because the one thing that we all have in common is that we were too nieve, we were innocent suckers. We didn’t want to judge, we only saw the good in everyone because there was only good in us.
I walked around with a gold cross around my neck (still do) and drove with a rosary hanging from my rear view mirror.
What psychopath could resist that? Especially when it came with a 17-year old girl with a killer body in a tight skirt and high heels. Even had a great job that paid for the slacker to slack.
That’s funny Skylar. Do you think that’s why, in the last two years that I’ve been NC, I’ve gained twenty pounds? I was always quite slim. Maybe it’s just menopause. It’s just funny,I left him, had my last period two months later, decided, for the first time in my life, I didn’t want a man, and gained twenty pounds. Do you think it’s protective insulation?
skylar….thanks for the link to the perception test. Wonderful analogy for what happened to us. I love it!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Kim, you could end up with Enantiodromia! I’m pretty sure we all have it. LOL.
the following quote is from this link:
http://atlanta.creativeloafing.com/gyrobase/Content?oid=oid%3A4217
“…enantiodromia. The word, first used by the Greek philosopher Heraclitus, derives from “enatio” (counter) and “dromia” (running). The idea is that when you start running in one direction, a counter-movement sets in. It was Heraclitus’ way of expressing the fundamentally oppositional nature of existence.
As James Hillman argues, enantiodromia became the foundation of Carl Jung’s psychology, particularly his theory of compensation, which had as much importance to him as wish-fulfillment did to Freud.
Enantiodromia works this way: The more committed you are to your position, the more the opposite will begin to nudge you as a compensation. Perhaps you are a family values advocate. You write screeds for your church newsletter and donate money and time to the religious right. You’re a pillar of righteousness. Boom! You find yourself suddenly consorting with whores and one day you’re photographed on your way into Madam Mammary’s Maison de Massage and Bible Study. A scandal erupts.
People will call you a hypocrite, of course. A more accurate description is that you’ve previously been unconscious, for Jung and Heraclitus did not suggest that this process lacks intention. The function of enantiodromia is to make you conscious. So, if you are wise, you will stop and wonder how to accommodate both the weird drives of your libido and your desire to do the right thing by your family and community. You may become more temperate, or maybe not. You are psychically restructured. You become “a stranger to yourself.”
Skylars blog re the conquest of evil, by Heinrich robert Zimmer, reminded me of this Nun joke. hope you like it.
Two Nuns are driving a car through Transylvania,-home of vampires.
Mother Superior is driving. Novice Nun ,sitting beside her says,”Mother, what shall we do, if a vampire shows up”?
M.P says,
“Show him your Cross”! {ie, crucifix. to ward off Vampires}.
Just then, a horrible vampire appears. leering throught the window, on the Novices side.
She winds the window down, and shouts,
“Just bugger off, you great, ugly ,toothy git!”
{She showed him she was cross!.LOL!!}Gem.XX