By Joyce Alexander, RNP (retired)
Psychopaths do a great deal of damage to their victims. The fact that there are people who are aware of what they are doing and choose to “look the other way” or to “sit on the fence and do nothing” enables the psychopaths to continue to abuse their victims. If the bystanders would stand up and assist the victims, even acknowledge that they are being victimized, the psychopaths might not be quite so successful.
One of the most famous of these enablers who chose to look the other way was a man named Pontius Pilate, the Roman prefect in Jerusalem in AD 33. When Jesus was brought before him by the Jewish leaders, Pilate stated that he found “no fault” in Jesus, yet he gave Jesus over to the mob to be crucified.
To signify that he had no responsibility for the death of Jesus, Pilate had water and a basin brought and he literally “washed his hands” of what the mob intended to do. Yet, he did nothing to stop it.
The dictionary defines the word “minion” as “a servile follower or subordinate of a person in power.” These people also enable the psychopath to continue to victimize their prey by either helping the psychopath, or by simply “looking the other way” as Pilate did. Minions can also be very active participants with the psychopath in the victimization of the prey.
Examples of doing nothing
A famous case of people knowing a horrible crime was being committed and doing nothing was the murder of Kitty Genovese outside her Queens, NY, home in March, 1964. There were 38 witnesses who did nothing—not even call the cops when they heard her scream for nearly a half hour as she was repeatedly stabbed on that fateful night.
A more recent example of people doing nothing is the Penn State case of Jerry Sandusky’s pedophilia. The head coach and the president of the university knew what Sandusky was doing and chose to do nothing, which allowed Sandusky to continue to abuse young boys sexually for more several years.
Of course not all “enabling” of psychopaths are as “serious” as the crucifixion of Christ, the molestation of dozens of young boys, or the brutal murder of a young woman. But the help and support offered by others does enable psychopaths to “get away with” much more than they would otherwise.
Tattling and telling
We teach our kids not to be “tattle tales” and kids learn not to “snitch” on each other. When my kids were little, I tried to teach them the difference between “tattling” and “telling.” “Tattling” was saying “Johnny called me a doo doo,” but that “telling” was saying, “Johnny is playing with matches and setting fire to the curtains.”
I don’t support gossip or tattling in any way, but we must be aware that when we keep our mouths shut and allow evil to flourish, we are contributing to that evil.
My guess is that most of the people reading this on Lovefraud have experienced people being enablers (either actively or passively) to the psychopath that abused them. People either knew the truth and turned their backs, or actively participated in helping the psychopath accomplish their abuse.
Blame the victim
Psychopaths are also usually very good at the “smear campaign.” When the victim is finally trying to break free, they smear the name, sanity and reputation of the victim to everyone who will listen. Unfortunately, too many times the victim is blamed for their own victimization, or labeled crazy or vindictive for trying to protect themselves. “Yeah he hit her, but she was so mouthy, what can you expect?” Or “well if she’d been a better wife, he wouldn’t have needed to cheat.”
The hurt for the victim becomes double or treble when the enabler or fence sitter is someone the victim counted on for support, such as friend, neighbor, co-worker, relative or even the police and the courts. When someone you have counted on to believe you and validate you, instead turns their back on you, in addition to the trauma from the psychopath, the pain may be simply overwhelming, leaving the victim feeling totally abandoned.
No help
I can’t even imagine the horror that Kitty Genovese must have felt that night as she cried out in terror for someone to save her. Yet, I know that many victims of psychopaths have cried out to people that they expected would help them, would support them, only to find a total lack of concern.
The news reports today are filled with stories of people who “knew” and yet did nothing, or worse, helped the abusers. Whistle blowers are still persecuted relentlessly. Those are facts of life.
For what it is worth, though, even if no one else believes us, it doesn’t change the truth or the facts. While we would appreciate support and validation from others, we don’t always get it, even from those we hold most dear. Learning to validate our own knowledge of the truth may be the closest we come to receiving support.
In my own situation, essentially my entire family, immediate and extended, have either actively assisted my psychopathic son Patrick, stood by silently while he tried to harm me, or washed their hands and didn’t even bother to listen. It hurts when those we have depended on fail us, but it is not the end of the world. In most cases, and we can move on. We can learn to validate ourselves and what we know is the truth.
Fortunately, there is Lovefraud, and the many bloggers here who do support and validate us in our healing journey. I hope that each person here will feel free to reach out to others for support when you need it, and that you will reach out to extend validation and support to others who need your support. That’s what it is all about.
God bless.
Dupey-poo, consider the “Blabber Button” activated…..
Let ‘er RIP! (guffawing mightily)
O MY: You certainly ARE a brave-soul,
aren’t you, Truthspeak? hahahaha
“Blabber Button”.
That is something that needs to be installed on all spaths,
with an ON/OFF switch. Preferably, only an ‘off’. The
‘blabber button switch off’ switch. hehehe
I think it makes all of us women ‘feminists’.
That is the ‘don’t take crap sector’ of our feminine
species and society.
Like that answer, Sister?
I have noticed that spaths don’t particularly ‘like’
the stronger of us….too much competition for them?
TOO CHICKEN TO DANCE?
I mean “WHAT” is “THAT” all about, anyways?
xxoo
According to Wiki:
Feminism is a collection of movements and ideologies aimed at defining, establishing, and defending equal political, economic, and social rights for women.
I would say that if we are standing for ourselves,
aren’t we in a way, standing for all women?
Think about that one.
Dupey,
Yup, that’s feminism: a social movement for equal rights for women. Nothing more, nothing less; the right for a woman to choose how to live her life how she feels it will make her the most happy: if that’s a Phd and/or career that’s fine; if that’s keeping house that’s fine too (though I do both, hehe). As long it is what a woman believes will make her most happy, then it’s a feminist choice.
And I expect a HEALTHY man to support and applaud his partner’s choices what to do with her life, including recognizing she may change her mind through the years, just like men do. Men who don’t wish a woman to lead her life from the equal premisse as a man, is a control freak imo.
I agree darwinsmom.
A woman should be allowed to flourish in this life,
just the same as a man does. Without bias; without
prejudice and without any backlash.
Unfortunately, most men, I found, don’t like ‘strong’
women. They prefer the weak. To ppaths/spaths,
the weak are the better ‘targets’. Easier to manipulate.
Yes: the right of a woman to choose how she lives HER
life. Living it to make HERSELF HAPPY above all else.
While some may consider that selfish, I don’t see it
that way at all. We are all entitled to live our lives
the way we choose. Even ppaths/spaths.
Yes: a ‘HEALTHY’ man will support his woman in whatever
dreams she chooses to chase. Exactly!
Darwinsmom, that clinches it – I’m a screaming, foaming-at-the-mouth feminist. I deserve to have every opportunity to make choices FOR myself, BY myself, and be rewarded equally for a job well-done.
On the other thread, the word, “TRUST,” was mentioned a number of times, and human beings (women, as well as men) have the RIGHT and mandate to trust their own judgement, good or bad.
So, I don’t know how feminism became part of the discussion of enabling, but I think I’d better let sleeping things lie, now.
Brightest blessings
It is a complicated subject because I trusted myself before I met him. But then I gave him the keys to my car, literally, on the second time we met –before I even asked his name. He asked me out and I said that my car was broke down and I had to work on it. He offered to fix it if I went out with him. I agreed wholeheartedly because nobody else had been able to fix it and I doubted that he would, so I gave him the keys and told him where to find the car.
Little did I imagine that he would come driving up in it 15 minutes later –and by the way it was at least a ten minute walk to the car. Now I understand that HE had been the one who had disabled it. Sabotage followed by rescue, is his M.O.
They all do it. Some do it one way, others another way. The green river murderer would murder his victims and then help the police look for them. Create the problem, then offer to help fix it. Typical spath behavior.
So anyway, giving him the keys to the car was followed by the keys to my life. Speaking of keys, one day he handed me a key ring and said, “I duplicated all your keys for you while you were asleep, just in case you ever lose yours.” WTF?
I wish I had had some boundaries, but noooooo. I convinced myself, despite the strange feeling in my gut, that he was being helpful.
After that I handed him control, little by little, of each part of my life. I trusted HIM and he needed control.
There was only one boundary I kept: Money. If he wanted money he had to ask for it. And boy did he ask for it. At the end, it was a $20 bill each day. He was trying to nickel and dime me to death. But he would rage if I didn’t give it to him. So it was easier to do that.
His mistake, at the end, was getting in a hurry. I think that is the mistake that all spaths make which makes them get caught. You have to boil a frog slowly or it will jump out.
His final con was supposed to force me to turn the business over to him. So he would finally have complete control of all the money. Here was this moron who couldn’t save a penny (LITERALLY) and he thought I was going to turn over my finances to him? Fat chance.
That’s when my eyes flew open and I heard a bell go off. I did trust him with most things, but I did not trust him with my finances. It was the one boundary that my parents had instilled in me, so when he made his goal obvious, I knew and I jumped out of the boiling water just in the nick of time.
skylar: hmmm….
with my x ppath it was ‘trauma bonding’. ICK!
what a waste of human flesh. Seriously.
Happy you escaped.
I managed to, as well.
I shall forever be grateful to the powers that are.
Dupey
Ahhhh, yes. Most proud to be a feminist! Towanda.
Being the “perfect, Christian woman’, means, RUN LIKE HELL. YOU GOT A SPATH IN THR HOUSE.
Sky, I have a question to ask you, if you are around, this evening. Or perhaps someone else might be able to provide me with information or insight. This would be regarding the book; People of The Lie, by M. Scott Peck, that came recommended by Skylar. Today, is was recommended to me by my therapist. I will pick up a copy, tomorrow. Tonight, unrelated to the book, I wikkied “Evil”. There were referrences made to a few psychologists, Judeo-Christianity, a few centuries old Rulers, etc. of their definitions of “Evil”. One of whom is M. Scott Peck. For some reason, Prior to reading on Wikipedia, I got the impression that the book was somehow going to validate that the bad deeds of the consciensless/pathalogicals/psychopaths would be termed as evil, however, Wiki quotes the following:
Peck considers those he calls evil to be attempting to escape and hide from their own conscience (through self-deception) and views this as being quite distinct from the apparent absence of conscience evident in sociopaths.
So I am pondering this belief of Peck’s. Does this statement mean that he does not believe that the behavior should be concidered that of evil, if it is commited by a consienceless sociopath? And, if so, would this be because they are in fact “malignantly disordered”? I am wondering because, I have read over and over again that the disordered DO know good behavior from bad behavior, and they DO have the ability to Choose between behaving badly, or not.
I know I will learn more from reading the book, however I am dying of curosity about this.
~Many thanks