By Joyce Alexander, RNP (retired)
Psychopaths do a great deal of damage to their victims. The fact that there are people who are aware of what they are doing and choose to “look the other way” or to “sit on the fence and do nothing” enables the psychopaths to continue to abuse their victims. If the bystanders would stand up and assist the victims, even acknowledge that they are being victimized, the psychopaths might not be quite so successful.
One of the most famous of these enablers who chose to look the other way was a man named Pontius Pilate, the Roman prefect in Jerusalem in AD 33. When Jesus was brought before him by the Jewish leaders, Pilate stated that he found “no fault” in Jesus, yet he gave Jesus over to the mob to be crucified.
To signify that he had no responsibility for the death of Jesus, Pilate had water and a basin brought and he literally “washed his hands” of what the mob intended to do. Yet, he did nothing to stop it.
The dictionary defines the word “minion” as “a servile follower or subordinate of a person in power.” These people also enable the psychopath to continue to victimize their prey by either helping the psychopath, or by simply “looking the other way” as Pilate did. Minions can also be very active participants with the psychopath in the victimization of the prey.
Examples of doing nothing
A famous case of people knowing a horrible crime was being committed and doing nothing was the murder of Kitty Genovese outside her Queens, NY, home in March, 1964. There were 38 witnesses who did nothing—not even call the cops when they heard her scream for nearly a half hour as she was repeatedly stabbed on that fateful night.
A more recent example of people doing nothing is the Penn State case of Jerry Sandusky’s pedophilia. The head coach and the president of the university knew what Sandusky was doing and chose to do nothing, which allowed Sandusky to continue to abuse young boys sexually for more several years.
Of course not all “enabling” of psychopaths are as “serious” as the crucifixion of Christ, the molestation of dozens of young boys, or the brutal murder of a young woman. But the help and support offered by others does enable psychopaths to “get away with” much more than they would otherwise.
Tattling and telling
We teach our kids not to be “tattle tales” and kids learn not to “snitch” on each other. When my kids were little, I tried to teach them the difference between “tattling” and “telling.” “Tattling” was saying “Johnny called me a doo doo,” but that “telling” was saying, “Johnny is playing with matches and setting fire to the curtains.”
I don’t support gossip or tattling in any way, but we must be aware that when we keep our mouths shut and allow evil to flourish, we are contributing to that evil.
My guess is that most of the people reading this on Lovefraud have experienced people being enablers (either actively or passively) to the psychopath that abused them. People either knew the truth and turned their backs, or actively participated in helping the psychopath accomplish their abuse.
Blame the victim
Psychopaths are also usually very good at the “smear campaign.” When the victim is finally trying to break free, they smear the name, sanity and reputation of the victim to everyone who will listen. Unfortunately, too many times the victim is blamed for their own victimization, or labeled crazy or vindictive for trying to protect themselves. “Yeah he hit her, but she was so mouthy, what can you expect?” Or “well if she’d been a better wife, he wouldn’t have needed to cheat.”
The hurt for the victim becomes double or treble when the enabler or fence sitter is someone the victim counted on for support, such as friend, neighbor, co-worker, relative or even the police and the courts. When someone you have counted on to believe you and validate you, instead turns their back on you, in addition to the trauma from the psychopath, the pain may be simply overwhelming, leaving the victim feeling totally abandoned.
No help
I can’t even imagine the horror that Kitty Genovese must have felt that night as she cried out in terror for someone to save her. Yet, I know that many victims of psychopaths have cried out to people that they expected would help them, would support them, only to find a total lack of concern.
The news reports today are filled with stories of people who “knew” and yet did nothing, or worse, helped the abusers. Whistle blowers are still persecuted relentlessly. Those are facts of life.
For what it is worth, though, even if no one else believes us, it doesn’t change the truth or the facts. While we would appreciate support and validation from others, we don’t always get it, even from those we hold most dear. Learning to validate our own knowledge of the truth may be the closest we come to receiving support.
In my own situation, essentially my entire family, immediate and extended, have either actively assisted my psychopathic son Patrick, stood by silently while he tried to harm me, or washed their hands and didn’t even bother to listen. It hurts when those we have depended on fail us, but it is not the end of the world. In most cases, and we can move on. We can learn to validate ourselves and what we know is the truth.
Fortunately, there is Lovefraud, and the many bloggers here who do support and validate us in our healing journey. I hope that each person here will feel free to reach out to others for support when you need it, and that you will reach out to extend validation and support to others who need your support. That’s what it is all about.
God bless.
Interesting discussion about M. Scott Peck. I first read,”The Road Less Traveled” about 25 years ago, and it was the first step on my path of spiritual self awareness. Later, I read, “People of the Lie” and have since read it again.
Peck’s view is similar to Jung’s, and is, I think very profound, since he looks at issues of projection and scape-goating.
I thought I would post this link, since I think it explains malignant narcissism very well, and as Peck seems to imply, is synonomous with human evil.
http://www.geftakysassembly.com/Articles/Perspectives/MalignantNarcissism.htm
Anam cara,
some do and some don’t.
My sister thinks evil is ok, so maybe she doesn’t understand the meaning of evil. Narcissism creates double standards, so they think that they are entitled to do whatever they please.
It’s just so strange that she can think those things.
ExSpath on the other hand, is pure evil and takes delight in it.
Your sister’s behavior is an example of projection.
You might be interested in reading about that
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Psychological_projection
it’s fascinating.
Another thing I’ve been reading about is “splitting”.
I’d like to have a better understanding of it, but it’s a difficult concept and I’m having trouble really wrapping my head around it. It is related to projection and also to “transference” (substitute victims). All these concepts are really important in understanding the spaths and OURSELVES.
If anyone can explain “splitting” to me, I’d appreciate it.
Here’s the wiki on it.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Splitting_(psychology)
Am currently tackling Otto Kernberg’s “Severe Personality Disorders” and it’s not easy to get without understanding these terms first.
One interesting thing I’ve learned is that, contrary to how I imagined, these phenomena actually oscillate very quickly back and forth inside the disordered person’s mind. Which explains how they can say one thing and the opposite in the next sentence.
Shane,
no I haven’t read the screwtape letters. I heard about them years ago and found the concept revolting. Pretty much my whole life, I’ve avoided looking at evil. The first movie my spath took me to was Terminator and after Arnold walked in and murdered someone point blank, I walked out. I told him I didn’t want to be exposed to that kind of violence. (Then I got my money back at the window –boundaries!)
Recently, I got a book by a catholic priest and within the first chapter, he was saying that there was good in everyone…argh.
And get this, you’ll love his first example: Ted Bundy. LMAO.
It gets better: He knows that there was good in Ted Bundy because of a youtube video of Ted in prison being interviewed and it showed the human side of him. I can’t remember the exact section that the priest referred to but I remember that I had also watched (with much revulsion) that video, and it was a PURE PITY PLOY. I think it had something to do with wanting to help psychologists understand what made him the way he was. In truth, he was looking for any angle to save his life.
But, the most important part of the video, (and the reason I bring this up) is because of what Ted says near the end. He tells the interviewer that people like him were everywhere. He says that they could be your father or brother or the guy on the bus next to you.
That is the truth. Ted can tell us this with authority because spaths can spot each other. The more sick they are, the better they are at spotting another sicko. And Ted was very near the top of the sicko pile.
At the same time, Ted knew that the interviewer could not imagine the truth of what he was being told. He couldn’t imagine just how pervasive the spaths are. So you could see the smugness in Ted’s face as he told the truth knowing he wouldn’t be believed. Just like my ex-spath’s face when he told me he had used strychnine on me — really I didn’t believe it. But then I figured out it was true.
The thing about feces, is that if you don’t know what it looks like, you’re gonna step in it. I don’t close my eyes anymore.
Kim,
Wow! great link.
kim:
Thanks so much for this link.
Kim Frederick, what a fantastic page. The one thing that stood out enough for me to post it was:
DISGUISE AND PRETENSE:
“While they seem to lack any motivation to be good, they intensely desire to appear good. Their “goodness” is all on a level of pretense. It is, in effect, a lie. That is why they are the “people of the lie”. The wickedness of the evil is not committed directly, but indirectly as a part of this cover-up process. p 76
Those who are evil are masters of disguise; they are not apt to wittingly disclose their true colors–either to others or to themselves. p 104 Because they are such experts at disguise, it is seldom possible to pinpoint the maliciousness of the evil. The disguise is usually impenetrable p 76….Naturally, since it is designed to hide its opposite, the pretense chosen by the evil is most commonly the pretense of love. p 106″
Oh, holyshitballs, does this boil it down to it’s core elements. The exspath was so farking adept at presenting his disguise and pretense that I do not have the proper grasp of language to describe how ruptured I felt when I discovered what he truly was.
I think that this aspect is what had me so snowed with pretty much all of the spaths that I’ve encountered. Nearly all of them PRETENDED and DISGUISED what they were. A very few were obviously “bad blood,” and people to avoid, at all costs. But, the most clever were great actors and presenters. In fact, one of the spaths that I had an association with was approached by a SAG actor (quite likely N and possibly SPath) to study the craft of acting. He said (and I quote), “She is so genuine.” Oh, my, she was “genuine,” alright – a genuine ex-convict that had a number of the population fooled.
Disguise and pretense…..ugh
Brightest blessings
Wow: This is amazing (excerpt):
“The poor in spirit do not commit evil. Evil is not committed by people who feel uncertain about their righteousness, who question their own motives, who worry about betraying themselves. The evil in this world is committed by the spiritual fat cats, by the Pharisees of our own day, the self-righteous who think they are without sin because they are unwilling to suffer the discomfort of significant self-examination.
Unpleasant though it may be, the sense of personal sin is precisely that which keeps our sin from getting out of hand. It is quite painful at times, but it is a very great blessing because it is our one and only effective safeguard against our own proclivity for evil.”
Wow: someone has really pinpointed this; hm?
Dupey, yes….I read the page and this is poignant, too.
In the past 5 years of the marriage – coincidentally, after the money had begun to disappear – I began developing all sorts of “faults” and the exspath was always quick to point his perceptions out to me in such a way that he was actually dismantling my self-esteem, self-worth, and self-perceptions without my even being aware of this. At one point, I began to wonder how the fark it had gotten to the point that it had and I said, “Well, if we were all as perfect as you are, nobody would EVER make a mistake (or, whatever it was that he was criticizing).” His response? “That’s right.”
At the time, I just interpreted those two syllables as being a defense mechanism – sarcasm. But, in hindsight, he was absolutely dead serious. He honestly believes that he is without fault.
CREEEEEEEEPY stuff………just creepy stuff.
Brightest blessings
Kim Frederick, this was a fantastic link that you posted – THANK you so very much!!!!
One time my x ppath told me that he WAS GOD and that he
could make it rain and stop. That MY GOD has only brought
sorrow, pain and hurt, but HIM: he could bring so much freedom
and fun….
And, YES: he absolutely was dead serious.
MORE than ‘creepy’.
Sick.
I just want it away from me and out of my head.
EDIT: the cult of personality, in his own mind.
Dupey